Item Placement Service for Co-Purchased Product Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online retailers face challenges in fulfilling multi-item orders from a single storage facility due to physical limitations, leading to split orders and increased shipping costs, as conventional strategies fail to accurately predict co-purchasing patterns and item affinities.

Innovation Solution

An item placement service analyzes multi-item order data and similarity information to generate graphs that identify clusters of items likely to be ordered together, optimizing storage facility inventory by assigning these clusters to appropriate locations, thereby reducing the need for split orders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If items are distributed across multiple storage facilities to accommodate product variety, then the availability of products increases, but the likelihood of split orders increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct availabilityVSAvoidorder fulfillment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical order data and item similarity information before items are stored, pre-determining which items should be co-located in the same storage facility. This advance planning allows the system to proactively prevent split orders by ensuring frequently co-ordered items are stored together, rather than reactively addressing split orders after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts item placement strategies based on changing order patterns and item similarity relationships. By continuously analyzing order data and updating item cluster assignments, the system adapts to evolving customer behavior and product affinities, optimizing storage facility configurations to minimize split orders while maintaining product availability across multiple facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If items are stored in multiple storage facilities, then product selection expands, but shipping costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct selectionVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges items that are frequently ordered together into the same storage facility location, consolidating their storage despite the availability of multiple facilities. This merging strategy ensures that items which commonly appear in the same order are co-located, enabling single-shipment fulfillment and reducing the number of separate shipping operations required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips the intermediate step of splitting orders across multiple facilities by proactively placing related items in the same facility. This approach rushes through the potential problem of split orders by preventing it before it occurs, eliminating the need for separate shipping operations and associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Device complexity

If conventional storage strategies are used, then storage facility operations are simple, but co-purchasing patterns cannot be accurately predicted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage operation simplicityVSAvoidco-purchasing pattern prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously analyze historical order data and item similarity information to refine item placement decisions. By monitoring actual co-purchasing patterns and comparing them against predicted patterns, the system learns from past performance and adjusts its clustering algorithms to improve prediction accuracy over time, while maintaining automated operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces simple mechanical storage strategies with data-driven algorithms that analyze order patterns and item relationships. Instead of using fixed, rule-based placement methods, the system employs computational algorithms that process large volumes of order data to identify complex co-purchasing patterns, achieving high prediction accuracy through information processing rather than mechanical simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10147129B1Determining collections of similar items
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10147129B1 patent drawing
  • US10147129B1 patent drawing
  • US10147129B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for identifying groups of items that consumers are likely to purchase together. In some embodiments, a graph may be generated based on information regarding items that have been previously ordered together and information regarding the similarity or affinity between items. The graph may be analyzed to identify groups of items, wherein consumers are likely to order items in each group together. In some embodiments, each group of items may be assigned to a storage facility, and a list representative of the items stored in that storage facility may be modified to include the items in the group assigned to the storage facility.