Item Recommendation Control Platform for Dynamic Rule Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retailers lack a convenient method to adjust product recommendations on category and item detail pages to provide a more personalized experience, as existing systems do not allow for flexible control over inventory availability and shipping eligibility-based prioritization.

Innovation Solution

An item recommendation control platform that provides administrative users with interfaces to define and prioritize recommendation rules for specific nodes within a retail website, incorporating filters based on inventory availability and shipping eligibility, allowing for dynamic selection and prioritization of items for display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated recommendation algorithms are used to personalize item recommendations based on user browsing history, then recommendation relevance and user engagement are improved, but the ability of retailers to manually adjust recommendations for specific business goals (such as highlighting particular brands or controlling inventory visibility) is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation relevanceVSAvoidmanual control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables dynamic switching between automated recommendation modes and manual control modes. Administrators can dynamically adjust recommendation rules for specific nodes or item types, allowing the system to adapt between algorithm-driven personalization and business-goal-driven manual control based on real-time needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing key parameters of recommendation behavior through administrative controls. Administrators can modify parameters such as which items are recommended, their ordering priority, and visibility settings, thereby adjusting the recommendation output to align with specific business objectives while maintaining the automated infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If recommendation rules are made highly customizable with multiple filters and prioritization options, then the ability to control item presentation is improved, but the complexity of the administrative interface and rule configuration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation control flexibilityVSAvoidadministrative interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The administrative interface is segmented into distinct functional areas: node selection, filter configuration, prioritization rules, and visibility controls. Each segment handles a specific aspect of recommendation control, making the overall complex system more manageable through modular organization of controls and settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of recommendation rules that sits between the automated algorithms and the final item presentation. This intermediate rule layer absorbs the complexity of configuration, allowing administrators to work with simplified high-level controls rather than direct manipulation of complex recommendation logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If recommendation systems prioritize items based on inventory availability and shipping eligibility, then the accuracy and reliability of recommended items are improved, but the system's ability to promote strategically important items that may be out of stock or have limited shipping options is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem availability accuracyVSAvoidstrategic item promotion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically balances between reliability-based prioritization and strategic promotion by allowing administrators to override automated recommendations for specific items or categories. This dynamic adjustment capability enables the system to promote strategically important items even when they have limited availability, while maintaining overall reliability through automated filters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different prioritization qualities to different items or item groups. While general recommendations follow reliability-based filtering, specific locally important items can receive enhanced visibility or promotional treatment through targeted administrative rules, allowing strategic promotion without compromising overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11907996B2Item recommendation control platform
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US11907996B2 patent drawing
  • US11907996B2 patent drawing
  • US11907996B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An item recommendation control platform is disclosed. The item recommendation control platform presents an administrative user one or more user interfaces at which recommendation rules may be defined. Each of the recommendation rules may be associated with one or more nodes within a retail website, such as an item detail page or an item category page. The recommendation rules may be selected, defined, and prioritized, such that one or more item recommendation rules may be reflected within a given item recommendation presented on a retail website. The item recommendation rules can include one or more filters, the filters controlling which items may be recommended to a given user based, for example, on item availability or shipping availability.