Item-Specific Decision Tree Model for Recommendation Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recommendation systems face challenges such as the cold-start problem and biased music tracks distribution, where items with no ratings cannot be recommended and popular tracks dominate, while many tracks lack collaborative information.

Innovation Solution

The development of a machine learning model based on Decision Trees (DTs) using Gradient Boosting techniques for generating item-specific decision-tree (ISDT) models, which predict the likelihood of user interaction with digital items by utilizing user-item interaction data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If collaborative filtering techniques are used for content recommendation, then recommendation accuracy for items with sufficient data is improved, but items with no ratings or limited collaborative information cannot be recommended (cold-start problem)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidability to recommend new items
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the recommendation task into two distinct models: a collaborative filtering model for items with sufficient interaction data, and a content-based model for new items without ratings. This segmentation allows each model to operate in its optimal domain, resolving the cold-start problem while maintaining recommendation accuracy for established items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary hybrid recommendation system that bridges collaborative filtering and content-based approaches. This hybrid system acts as a mediator, automatically selecting or combining recommendations from both models based on item characteristics, thereby enabling recommendations for both new and established items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If popular tracks are prioritized in recommendation, then user engagement with recommended content is improved, but distribution becomes biased towards popular items and less popular tracks are overlooked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoiddistribution fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the recommendation approach item-specific: using collaborative filtering for popular items where it works well, and content-based filtering for less popular items. This localized approach allows the system to optimize for engagement with popular content while ensuring fair representation of niche content, thereby improving distribution fairness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the recommendation parameters dynamically based on item popularity metrics. For popular items, it uses interaction-based parameters from collaborative filtering; for less popular items, it switches to content-based parameters such as audio features, lyrics, and metadata. This parameter switching resolves the bias towards popular content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If content-based approaches are used for recommendation, then coverage of diverse content including new items is improved, but recommendation accuracy depends heavily on feature quality and selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent coverageVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two recommendation paradigms (collaborative filtering and content-based filtering) into a unified hybrid system. This combination allows the system to leverage the strengths of both approaches: the accuracy of collaborative filtering for established items and the coverage of content-based filtering for diverse and new content, thereby improving overall recommendation accuracy while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by allowing the recommendation system to switch between collaborative filtering and content-based approaches based on item characteristics. This dynamic behavior enables the system to optimize recommendation accuracy for each item type while maintaining broad content coverage across the catalog.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12306886B2Method and a server for generating a machine learning model
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 Y E HUB ARMENIA LLC
  • US12306886B2 patent drawing
  • US12306886B2 patent drawing
  • US12306886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and server for generating a machine learning model are disclosed. The method includes receiving user-item interaction data indicative of previous interactions between the plurality of users and a plurality of digital items, and generating, based on the user-item interaction data, the machine learning model for predicting scores indicative of a likelihood that a given user of the plurality of users will interact with a given digital item of the plurality of digital items. The model includes a plurality of item-specific decision-tree (ISDT) sub-models. A given one from the given plurality of DTs of a given ISDT sub-model having feature nodes and leaf nodes. The feature nodes correspond to the respective training features and the leaf nodes associated with output values of the given one from the given plurality of DTs.