Iterative Natural-Language Message Linking with Quantum-Classical Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Classical computing techniques for predictor valuation and selection are insufficiently accurate, personalized, and computationally inefficient for modern data analysis needs, particularly in terms of scale, volume, and velocity.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines classical and quantum data models to score and correlate features, using classical processors for initial scoring and quantum processors for enhanced accuracy, followed by a correlation and valuation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If quantum data model is executed multiple times to improve prediction accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by determining the optimal number of quantum data model iterations in advance using training data before actual prediction. The system executes the quantum model on training data to identify the point of diminishing returns, then uses this pre-determined iteration count for subsequent predictions, avoiding unnecessary computational time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the results of quantum data model executions to continuously refine and update the classical data model. The system feeds back the quantum model predictions into the classical model, allowing the classical model to learn from quantum results and improve its own prediction capabilities, reducing reliance on repeated quantum executions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If combined classical and quantum data models are used to enhance predictor valuation, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictor valuation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges classical and quantum data models into a unified hybrid system. The classical data model handles initial processing and benefit from quantum model refinements, creating an integrated system that leverages the strengths of both approaches while managing complexity through coordinated interaction between the two model types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the classical data model as an intermediary between data input and quantum model execution. The classical model prepares data, selects relevant features, and processes quantum model outputs, acting as a mediator that simplifies the interface between classical and quantum components and reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12412106B2Identifying related messages in a natural language interaction in multiple iterations
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12412106B2 patent drawing
  • US12412106B2 patent drawing
  • US12412106B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Using a classical data model executing on a classical processor, a set of classical features is scored. A score of a classical feature comprises an evaluation of a utility of the classical feature in predicting a result involving a resource. Using a quantum data model executing on a quantum processor and the scored set of classical features, a set of quantum features is scored. The quantum data model is executed a number of times previously determined using a set of results of executing the quantum data model on a set of annotated training data. The scored set of classical features and the scored set of quantum features are correlated, forming a combined set of scored features. Using the combined set of scored features and a first set of input data of a resource, a valuation of the resource is calculated.