Iterative Multi-Material Correction for CT Beam Hardening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multi-material correction (MMC) techniques in CT imaging are limited by assumptions that lead to residual beam hardening artifacts, requiring post-processing tuning and only one-step correction, which restricts the effectiveness of beam hardening correction and introduces errors in material decomposition and re-projection.

Innovation Solution

The iterative multi-material correction (iMMC) method reduces the number of materials analyzed to two basis materials, such as water and iodine, allowing for multiple iterations of correction by re-projecting water instead of iodine, enabling more accurate beam hardening correction without tuning parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multi-material correction (MMC) is performed using the assumption that re-projection of iodine approximates polychromatic projection of iodine after water BHC, then spectral calibration can be achieved, but the correction is limited to one-step procedure and residual beam hardening artifacts remain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam hardening correction accuracyVSAvoidcorrection procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The correction process is divided into multiple iterations, where each iteration performs material decomposition, re-projection, and correction on the reconstructed image. This segmentation allows progressive refinement of the correction, reducing residual artifacts while maintaining systematic control over the correction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic re-projection and re-correction cycles. In each iteration, the reconstructed image is re-projected to generate new projection data, which is then used to update the correction. This periodic action enables progressive elimination of beam hardening artifacts beyond the single-step limitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If iterative multi-material correction is performed by re-projecting water instead of iodine, then multiple iterations can be performed with improved accuracy, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial decomposition accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing power
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the re-projection material from iodine to water, which has different attenuation characteristics. Water re-projection provides a more stable reference for iterative correction, improving material decomposition accuracy. This parameter change enables the iterative process to converge more effectively while managing computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If post-processing parameter tuning is performed to correct beam hardening artifacts, then image quality can be improved, but the process requires additional time and manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidpost-processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The iterative multi-material correction algorithm performs self-correction through automated iterations of decomposition, re-projection, and correction. The system automatically refines the correction without requiring manual parameter tuning or post-processing intervention, reducing time loss while maintaining high image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

iMMC effectively reduces residual beam hardening artifacts, avoiding over or under-correction, and improves material decomposition and re-projection accuracy, leading to enhanced image quality with multiple rounds of correction.

Implementation Method 1

X-ray radiation spans a subject of interest, such as a human patient, and a portion of the radiation impacts a detector where the image data is collected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray radiation emission: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

In digital X-ray systems, a photodetector produces signals representative of the amount or intensity of radiation impacting discrete pixel regions of a detector surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

performing forward projection on at least the re-mapped image volume for that said material to produce a material-based projection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForward projection:

Implementation Method 4

a key assumption in MMC is that the re-projection of iodine in the first-pass CT images approximates the polychromatic projection of iodine after water BHC

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam hardening:

Data Source

PatentUS9683948B2Systems and methods for iterative multi-material correction of image data
Publication Date: 2017.06.20 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US9683948B2 patent drawing
  • US9683948B2 patent drawing
  • US9683948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for iterative multi-material correction are provided. A system includes an imager that acquires projection data of an object. A reconstructor reconstructs the acquired projection data into a reconstructed image, utilizes the reconstructed image to perform a multi-material correction on the acquired projection data to generate a multi-material corrected reconstructed image, and utilizes the multi-material corrected reconstructed image to perform one or more iterations of the multi-material correction on the projection data to generate an iteratively corrected multi-material corrected image.