Travel Itinerary Sharing with Automated Landmark Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Travelers face challenges in identifying additional landmarks or destinations not on their itinerary that could provide predictability and structure during trips, and sharing itineraries with multiple individuals, especially when security is a concern, as existing methods are time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing one or more processors and computer-readable storage devices to receive, store, and communicate travel itinerary data, identifying relevant landmarks and associating them with the itinerary, then sharing this information with a security detail for enhanced security and planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual methods are used to identify landmarks and share itineraries, then accuracy and completeness can be maintained, but time consumption and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to identify landmarks and share itineraryVSAvoidsystem complexity for automated landmark identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically identifying landmarks and generating shareable itinerary information without requiring manual intervention. The computer processor autonomously accesses location data, identifies relevant landmarks, and prepares sharing content, allowing the itinerary system to serve itself rather than requiring human operators to perform these tasks manually

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes with automated computational systems. Instead of manually researching and identifying landmarks, the system uses computer processors to automatically access databases, analyze location data, and identify relevant landmarks. This substitution of mechanical human effort with automated computing resolves the contradiction by dramatically reducing time loss while managing system complexity through software automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If itinerary sharing is restricted to maintain security and confidentiality, then information security is improved, but ease of sharing with multiple individuals deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity and confidentiality of itineraryVSAvoidease of sharing itinerary with multiple individuals
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments itinerary access by creating distinct sharing profiles for different individuals or groups. Each profile can have customized access levels and permissions, allowing the itinerary to be divided into secure segments that different people can access according to their specific needs and clearance levels, thus maintaining security while enabling multi-individual sharing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary sharing mechanism that acts as a controlled gateway between the confidential itinerary and multiple individuals. This intermediary layer manages authentication, authorization, and information distribution, allowing secure sharing with multiple people without compromising the underlying security and confidentiality of the itinerary data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive landmark information is collected for security purposes, then security coverage is improved, but information processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverage of travel planVSAvoidcomplexity of processing landmark data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by identifying and processing only the specific landmark information relevant to each particular itinerary segment or location. Rather than uniformly processing all possible landmark data globally, the system tailors its data collection and processing to the local context of each destination and route, improving security coverage while reducing overall processing complexity through localized, targeted analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9347782B1System and method for sharing a travel itinerary with a protective detail
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 CAPANO JEFF
  • US9347782B1 patent drawing
  • US9347782B1 patent drawing
  • US9347782B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for sharing a travel itinerary with a plurality of members of a protective detail tasked with protecting the security of an individual, includes one or more processors, one or more computer-readable tangible storage devices, and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more storage devices for execution by at least one of the one or more processors. The program instructions include first program instructions to receive and storing data representative of an itinerary comprising at least one destination an individual intends to travel to. The program instructions further include second program instructions to identify a landmark based on the received itinerary. The program instructions further include third program instructions to associate the identified landmark with the itinerary. The program instructions further include fourth program instructions to communicate data representative of the itinerary and the associated landmark to members of a security detail.