IVR Brokering Service Personalizing User Interactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IVR systems are frustrating for users due to a lack of personalization, leading to poor user experiences, as they are designed for the 80% average user, leaving 20% of users who do not fit the average profile to struggle with navigation, speech recognition, and architecture issues, resulting in low customer satisfaction.

Innovation Solution

An IVR brokering service with intelligent software agents that act as stateful and customized interaction brokers, normalizing the IVR experience by reformatting and refactoring various IVR systems to match user preferences, providing a unified interface, and enabling semi-automatic interaction with multiple IVR systems, including speech recognition and single-sign-on capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If IVR systems are designed to serve the needs of the 80% average user performing standard tasks, then the system can successfully navigate for the majority of users, but the 20% of users who do not fit the average profile will have poor user experiences

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIVR navigation easeVSAvoidUser profile adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The IVR system dynamically adapts its behavior based on user profile characteristics. The system monitors user interactions and adjusts menu structures, prompt styles, and navigation paths in real-time to match individual user preferences and abilities, transforming a static IVR into a dynamic, personalized system that evolves with each user's needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different IVR interaction models tailored to specific user segments. Instead of a uniform IVR experience, local customization is applied to different user profiles (e.g., simplified menus for less tech-savvy users, advanced options for power users), allowing each user group to receive optimized interaction quality matched to their specific needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If IVR systems increase menu depth and features to provide more functionality, then the system becomes more capable, but usability rapidly decreases for users

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIVR feature capabilityVSAvoidIVR usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The IVR menu structure is segmented into multiple hierarchical levels with intelligent routing. The system divides complex functionality into manageable sections and uses contextual awareness to present only relevant options at each level, preventing information overload while maintaining comprehensive functionality through organized, progressive disclosure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring user profiles, pre-loading preferred navigation paths, and anticipating user needs based on historical data. This preparation reduces the cognitive load on users during actual IVR interaction, as the system has already organized information and options in advance based on what each user is most likely to need

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If IVR systems use heterogeneous designs with different looks and feels for different systems, then each system can be optimized for its specific function, but users face confusion and poor experience across multiple systems

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIVR system specializationVSAvoidCross-system consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The IVR broker acts as a universal interface layer that provides consistent interaction models across multiple heterogeneous IVR systems. It translates user inputs from a standardized interface into system-specific protocols, allowing users to interact with different IVR systems through a unified, consistent experience while preserving the specialized functionality of each underlying system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8155276B2Synchronous and asynchronous brokering of IVR sessions for offline interaction and response
Publication Date: 2012.04.10 ARLINGTON TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US8155276B2 patent drawing
  • US8155276B2 patent drawing
  • US8155276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An IVR session brokering service provides as one core mechanism, a pool of intelligent software agents residing on a cluster-able software services platform. These agents could be designed to act as stateful and customized interaction brokers for interacting automatically and semi-automatically with existing IVR systems. Customers and users would use this brokering service as an IVR normalization and aggregation mechanism for centralizing and personalizing their user experience with a full range of IVR systems that are of interest to them. The service could consume, operate on and transform voice and touchtone communication information that is transmitted between IVR systems and the end-user customers that are currently using those IVR systems.