Intelligent IVR System for Proactive Intent Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IVR systems are inefficient in understanding customer needs and providing personalized services, leading to increased call duration and customer frustration due to their 'one size fits all' approach, which results in low customer satisfaction and failure to recognize previous interactions or dissatisfaction.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent IVR system identifies customers based on previous interactions, predicts their intent, and offers personalized services using a self-optimizing algorithm that adjusts on-the-fly, minimizing interaction time and enhancing customer experience by treating each customer uniquely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional IVR systems use a one size fits all approach with predefined menus, then device complexity is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but customer satisfaction deteriorates and call duration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIVR system structureVSAvoidcustomer satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by analyzing customer data, call history, and interaction patterns before the customer reaches the IVR menu. This allows the system to pre-determine the optimal service path and personalize the interaction flow in advance, eliminating the need for customers to navigate through generic predefined menus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The IVR system transitions from a static, fixed menu structure to a dynamic, adaptive interface that changes based on real-time customer identification, intent prediction, and historical interaction data. The service flow dynamically adjusts to match customer needs, reducing call duration and improving satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If traditional IVR systems treat all customers the same way through predefined menus, then ease of operation is improved for the system, but loss of information about customer needs and background increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operationVSAvoidcustomer background information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by analyzing customer responses, call outcomes, and interaction patterns. This feedback is used to refine intent prediction models and personalize future interactions, ensuring that customer background information is captured and utilized rather than lost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The IVR system performs self-service by automatically identifying customers, predicting their intent, and routing them to appropriate services without requiring manual configuration or human intervention. This maintains ease of operation while preventing information loss through automated data capture and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If traditional IVR systems do not recognize previous interactions, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time for customers to repeat information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction recognition capabilityVSAvoidcustomer call duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary customer identification and information retrieval before the interaction begins. By accessing customer databases and analyzing previous interaction patterns in advance, the system prepares personalized service paths that eliminate the need for customers to repeat information, reducing call duration without significantly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional IVR systems use standardized service delivery, then ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to individual customer needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice delivery standardizationVSAvoidpersonalized service capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing customized service experiences tailored to each customer's specific needs, history, and predicted intent. Different customers receive different service paths, information, and interactions based on their individual characteristics, while the underlying system architecture remains standardized and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9712671B2Method and apparatus for intent prediction and proactive service offering
Publication Date: 2017.07.18 24 7 AI INC
  • US9712671B2 patent drawing
  • US9712671B2 patent drawing
  • US9712671B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent IVR system identifies a customer based on previous customer interactions. Customer intent is predicted for an ongoing interaction and personalized services are proactively offered to the customer. A self-optimizing algorithm improves intent prediction, customer identity, and customer willingness to engage and use IVR.