Spring-Loaded J-Hook Valve Seat Puller for Axial Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing valve seat pullers in the oil and gas industry are complex, time-consuming, and prone to failure due to mechanical pivot systems, which are often obstructed by dirt and rust, requiring high torque for rotational lifting and resulting in downtime and costly repairs.

Innovation Solution

A spring-loaded J-shaped hook puller system that eliminates the need for mechanical pivots, utilizing flexible yet rigid metal hooks to engage and remove valve seats without rotational force, allowing for efficient and reliable extraction with a hydraulic jack.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a mechanical pivot system is used in the puller, then the hooks can be spread out to engage the seat, but the pivot system is obstructed by dirt and rust causing reliability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehook engagementVSAvoidpivot system failure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the mechanical pivot system entirely from the device. Instead of using hinges or pivots to spread the hooks, the invention uses a purely mechanical expansion mechanism where the hooks are forced outward by the expansion of the puller body, eliminating the unreliable pivot component that was prone to obstruction by dirt and rust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical pivot system with a direct mechanical expansion mechanism. Rather than relying on rotating or hinging components, the hooks are spread outward through the structural expansion of the puller body itself, substituting a complex mechanical pivot system with a simpler, more reliable expansion mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If high torque is applied for rotational lifting, then the seat can be removed, but it requires more force and increases the risk of damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat removal speedVSAvoidtorque requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional rotational lifting approach. Instead of applying torque to rotate and lift the seat, the invention uses a straight-pull axial extraction method where the puller body expands to engage the seat and then pulls it directly outward along the axis of the puller, eliminating the need for high torque rotational motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If a complex puller system is used, then it can engage the seat, but it consumes more time in removal translating to money lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat removal capabilityVSAvoiddown time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the puller into simple, functional segments: an expandable body with multiple hooks that can independently engage the seat. This segmented design allows for quick engagement and removal without the complexity of integrated mechanical systems, reducing the time required for seat removal while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The puller is designed to be pre-assembled and ready for immediate use. The expandable hooks are prepared in advance within the puller body, allowing for quick deployment and engagement with the seat without requiring complex assembly or adjustment during the removal process, thereby minimizing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Stress or pressure

If hydraulic jack is used to pull the shaft, then high pulling pressure can be applied, but the puller fails regularly under very high pulling pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepulling pressureVSAvoidpuller failure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the hydraulic jack directly with the puller body, eliminating the interface between separate components. The hydraulic force is applied directly to the expandable structure, distributing the high pulling pressure uniformly across the entire puller system rather than concentrating it at weak interface points, thereby preventing failure under high pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The spring-loaded puller system significantly reduces downtime, increases efficiency, and minimizes the risk of damage by enabling quick and easy removal of valve seats with reduced labor and equipment costs, while withstanding higher pressures and requiring fewer moving parts.

Implementation Method 1

spring loaded J-shaped hooks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10179397B1Valve seat puller
Publication Date: 2019.01.15 HUNTER JACOB
  • US10179397B1 patent drawing
  • US10179397B1 patent drawing
  • US10179397B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides an apparatus, system and method for replacing seats utilizing J-shaped hooks on a puller shaft that may be compressed to pass through the seat and expand back to engage the seat from below for pulling upward and removal.