Cellular Jamming Detection via Reference Signal Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Detecting signal jamming in cellular communication networks is challenging due to the lack of knowledge about jammer characteristics, and existing methods require auxiliary equipment like spectrum analyzers, which are not always effective in real scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines correlation between reference signals received at multiple antennas and checks consistency between traffic load and non-zero power signal strength to detect jamming, allowing for jamming detection without knowledge of jammer characteristics, using uplink or downlink reference signals like pilot symbols or zero-power data signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If auxiliary equipment like spectrum analyzers is used to detect jamming, then detection capability is improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejamming detection capabilityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cellular communication system performs self-diagnosis by using its own reference signals to detect jamming conditions. The base station analyzes correlation between reference signals received at multiple antennas and determines jamming states without requiring external spectrum analyzers or auxiliary equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Reference signals serve as intermediaries to detect jamming conditions. By analyzing the correlation properties of these known reference signals at multiple antennas, the system can identify jamming without directly measuring the jamming signal itself, thus avoiding the need for complex spectrum analysis equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If knowledge on jammer characteristics is required for detection, then detection precision is improved, but adaptability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejamming detection precisionVSAvoidapplicability to various jammers
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the approach from analyzing jammer-specific parameters to analyzing the correlation properties of reference signals. By detecting deviations in correlation values from expected patterns, the system can identify jamming without needing to know or adapt to specific jammer characteristics, making it universally applicable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of trying to directly detect and characterize the jamming signal, the system inverts the approach by detecting the absence or corruption of known reference signals. By analyzing what should be present (reference signals with specific correlation properties) and comparing against actual measurements, the system identifies jamming without needing jammer knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Measurement precision

If correlation analysis of reference signals is performed, then detection accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential correlation information from reference signals at multiple antennas, rather than performing full spectrum analysis or comprehensive signal characterization. By focusing computation on correlation coefficients and comparing against predefined thresholds, the system achieves accurate detection with reduced computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If consistency check between traffic load and signal strength is added, then detection reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a partial consistency check by examining only key parameters (traffic load and signal strength correlation) rather than comprehensive system state analysis. This selective approach enhances detection reliability by validating results through an additional consistency dimension while minimizing the time penalty through focused measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240080125A1Method and apparatus for detecting signal jamming in a cellular communication network
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240080125A1 patent drawing
  • US20240080125A1 patent drawing
  • US20240080125A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention generally relates to wireless communication technology. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method for detecting signal jamming in a cellular communication network. The present invention also relates to apparatus and computer program product adapted for the same purpose. According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method for detecting signal jamming in a cellular communication network comprises the following steps: determining correlation between reference signals received at a plurality of antennas in a cell; and determining whether the cell is in a jamming-suspicious state on the basis of the correlation and consistency between a traffic load and non-zero power signal strength in the cell.