Java Bytecode Graphical Representation for Debugging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Debugging tools for JAVA programs face challenges in efficiently generating a graphical representation of JAVA bytecode without requiring the execution of the program in a development environment or compilation for debugging, leading to computational intensity and difficulty in reviewing large amounts of trace data to identify underlying errors.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a debugging tool with modules like a monitor, recording, playback, and parsing module that interacts with JAVA bytecode to generate a graphical representation, allowing debugging outside a development environment and providing a user interface to visualize inter-relationships between bytecode blocks, enabling efficient error identification without needing source code or JVM debugging mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If debugging specific instructions are inserted into source code, then debugging capability is improved, but programmer effort and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging capabilityVSAvoidprogrammer effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a graphical copy or representation of the bytecode execution flow instead of modifying the original source code with debugging instructions. The debugging tool generates a visual model that mirrors the program's execution path, allowing developers to analyze bytecode behavior without inserting actual debugging code into the source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary debugging tool that sits between the bytecode and the developer. This tool translates raw bytecode execution into a graphical representation, mediating the interaction between the compiled code and the developer's analysis needs without requiring direct modification of the source code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If debugging specific instructions are executed, then debugging information is obtained, but execution speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging informationVSAvoidexecution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by generating the graphical representation of bytecode execution flow before actual debugging occurs. The debugging tool pre-processes the bytecode to create a visual model that can be analyzed without executing debugging instructions during runtime, thus preserving execution speed while obtaining debugging information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of executing debugging instructions that slow down the program, the patent creates a separate graphical copy of the execution flow. This copy can be analyzed statically or with minimal overhead, providing debugging information without the performance penalty of inserting and executing debugging code in the original program.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of information

If large amount of trace data is generated, then program execution details are captured, but data review difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram execution detailsVSAvoiddata review difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large amount of trace data into a structured graphical representation with distinct visual elements for different execution aspects. By dividing the execution flow into visual blocks, nodes, and connections, the tool organizes overwhelming data into manageable segments that are easier to review and understand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms one-dimensional trace data (linear log output) into a two-dimensional graphical representation. This dimensional change allows developers to visualize execution flow, method calls, and variable states spatially rather than scrolling through linear text, making pattern recognition and error identification significantly easier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If source code and importation data are available, then inter-relationships between classes and methods are displayed, but debugging compiled bytecode becomes impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisualization of inter-relationshipsVSAvoiddebugging capability for compiled bytecode
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a graphical copy of the bytecode structure and execution flow directly from the compiled bytecode without requiring source code. By reverse-engineering the bytecode into a visual representation, the tool provides the same inter-relationship visualization benefits as source code analysis while working exclusively with compiled bytecode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary process that translates raw bytecode into a graphical format that reveals class and method relationships. This intermediary translation layer enables the debugging tool to display inter-relationships similar to source code analysis while working with compiled bytecode that lacks original source code or import data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8826233B2Graphical representation of a JAVA bytecode
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 SAP SE
  • US8826233B2 patent drawing
  • US8826233B2 patent drawing
  • US8826233B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for graphing JAVA bytecode. JAVA bytecode is analyzed to identify blocks of bytecode that are consecutively executed without being targeted by branching instructions. The links in the form of branching instructions or target based breaks are also identified. The blocks and links are then graphed to facilitate the review and debugging of the program. The graph can be optimized to improve the readability of the graph.