Java Garbage Collection Dynamic Stack Map Creation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing garbage collection methods in Java are memory-intensive and processor-intensive, particularly due to the need for precise reference identification, which can lead to inefficient memory recycling and incorrect identification of garbage objects.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically identifies reference values at the execution point during garbage collection, using a technique that creates a snapshot of the stack map only when needed, allowing for efficient memory management by marking and reallocating memory areas without relying on pre-stored information, and employing a data-flow analysis to categorize variables of indefinite type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pre-stored stack maps are used for reference identification, then reference identification accuracy is improved, but memory usage and processor overhead increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereference identification accuracyVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static pre-stored stack maps to dynamic on-demand stack map creation. The system creates stack maps only when garbage collection is needed, rather than maintaining them continuously in memory. This dynamic approach reduces memory consumption while preserving reference identification accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by creating stack maps only at specific intervals when garbage collection is triggered, rather than continuously maintaining them. The stack map creation is scheduled periodically based on garbage collection needs, reducing overall memory usage and processor overhead while maintaining functionality when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring of data write operations is performed, then reference identification precision is improved, but processor intensity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereference identification precisionVSAvoidprocessor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by performing reference identification only when garbage collection is triggered, rather than continuously monitoring data write operations. The system periodically creates stack maps at garbage collection points, reducing processor intensity while maintaining reference identification precision when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary action by performing data-flow analysis and categorizing variables of indefinite type in advance during bytecode verification, before garbage collection occurs. This preliminary categorization reduces the processing burden during actual garbage collection, lowering processor intensity while maintaining identification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If multi-threaded garbage collection is implemented, then memory recycling efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory recycling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the garbage collection process into distinct phases: bytecode verification phase for data-flow analysis and variable categorization, and garbage collection phase for reference identification and memory reclamation. This segmentation allows multi-threaded execution during the collection phase while keeping the verification phase relatively simple and sequential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by introducing a stack map data structure as a mediator between the bytecode verification phase and the garbage collection phase. The stack map stores reference information in a structured format that can be efficiently processed during garbage collection, simplifying the interaction between threads and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If precise reference identification is performed, then garbage collection accuracy is improved, but execution time and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegarbage collection accuracyVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing data-flow analysis and variable type categorization during bytecode verification, before garbage collection executes. This preliminary work categorizes variables as reference or non-reference types, reducing the time needed during actual garbage collection while maintaining high accuracy in identifying garbage objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamics by creating stack maps on-demand during garbage collection rather than maintaining them continuously. This dynamic approach reduces the time spent on reference identification by only creating stack maps when needed, while still achieving precise garbage collection accuracy through thorough analysis at those moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8176286B2Memory recycling in computer systems
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 ARM LTD
  • US8176286B2 patent drawing
  • US8176286B2 patent drawing
  • US8176286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Execution of a processing task within a data processing system is controlled by executing the processing task including allocating memory areas for data storage and then suspending an actual execution path of said processing task at a given execution point to perform memory management. The memory management involves identifying one or more data items occurring in the course of execution and accessible to the processing task at the given execution point, which specify reference values pointing to respective ones for the memory areas. A correlation is determined between reference values corresponding to identified data items and memory areas allocated during the execution up to the given execution point. A memory management operation is performed on allocated memory areas in dependence upon results of the correlation.