Jaw System Control Using Reinforcement Learning for Package Formation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food packaging systems face challenges in precisely controlling the formation of individual packages due to complex interactions between sub-systems, especially the jaw system, which are difficult to model and require manual tuning of PID controllers, leading to misalignments and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a reinforcement learning model, particularly deep reinforcement learning with neural networks, to process both local and remote sub-system variables, enabling precise control of the jaw system by adjusting control parameters based on a combination of local and remote measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If PID controllers are used to control individual sub-systems in food packaging equipment, then each sub-system can be controlled with conventional techniques, but the system cannot adapt to unforeseen circumstances or changes outside the conventional working zone, requiring time-consuming manual re-tuning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to unforeseen conditionsVSAvoidtime for manual tuning and re-calibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs self-tuning by automatically adjusting PID parameters based on real-time process data and performance feedback, eliminating the need for manual intervention. The system monitors its own performance and autonomously optimizes control parameters when process changes are detected, enabling adaptive response to unforeseen conditions without requiring expert personnel intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback mechanisms that monitor process variables and control performance in real-time. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust control parameters and detect when process changes occur, triggering automatic re-tuning sequences that adapt the control system to new operating conditions without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the number of sub-systems and elements in food packaging equipment increases, then the system can perform more complex packaging tasks, but capturing influencing factors from different sources becomes increasingly difficult and the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex packaging capabilitiesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple PID controllers into a coordinated control system where controllers for different sub-systems (web tension, jaw positioning, sealing) are integrated and communicate with each other. This merging allows the system to handle complex packaging tasks while reducing the overall complexity of capturing influencing factors, as the coordinated controllers share data and adjust parameters in a unified manner

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system implements a universal coordination framework that can manage multiple sub-systems and elements through a common control architecture. This multi-functional approach allows the same control mechanisms to be applied across different sub-systems, reducing the complexity of capturing and managing influencing factors from various sources while maintaining the ability to perform complex packaging operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual tuning of PID controllers is performed for each sub-system, then control parameters can be optimized for specific working ranges, but significant manual input from experienced personnel is required, especially when a large number of elements are involved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol parameter optimizationVSAvoidmanual input requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically performs the tuning process that would otherwise require experienced personnel. By implementing self-tuning algorithms that analyze process data and autonomously adjust PID parameters, the system achieves optimized control for specific working ranges without requiring manual intervention from skilled operators, significantly reducing the ease of operation burden when multiple elements are involved

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12404058B2Enhancing package formation in a food packaging system based on reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE SA
  • US12404058B2 patent drawing
  • US12404058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus described for forming individual packages in a food packaging machine comprising a plurality of sub-systems. One or more local variable values are received, which indicate measurements by the food packaging machine of one or more physical parameters for a local sub-system. One or more remote variable values are received, which indicate measurements by the food packaging machine of one or more physical parameters for one or remote sub-systems. One or more control parameter values are determined for the local sub-system of the food packaging machine, by processing the remote variable values and the local variable values using a reinforcement learning model and a local control model. One or more control parameters of the local sub-system are adjusted in accordance with the determined control parameter values. The formation of individual packages by the food packaging machine is controlled in accordance with the adjusted one or more control parameters.