J-Edit NMR Pulse Sequence for Olefin Detection in Oil Samples

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current NMR methods for analyzing oil samples struggle to accurately distinguish between hydrocarbons and synthetic oil-based muds, particularly in identifying the presence of olefins, which are indicative of synthetic base fluids, due to overlapping J-coupling signals from aromatic and double-bonded carbons.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a J-editing pulse sequence with chemically selective excitation and J-modulation scans, incorporating a Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) detection method, allows for the detection of specific J-encoding time signals at 150 Hz, indicating the presence of olefins, thereby differentiating between natural hydrocarbons and synthetic oil-based muds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional NMR methods are used to analyze oil samples, then general hydrocarbon identification is possible, but accurate distinction between natural hydrocarbons and synthetic oil-based muds containing olefins cannot be achieved due to overlapping J-coupling signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracy of olefinsVSAvoidNMR pulse sequence complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The NMR pulse sequence is segmented into multiple distinct modules: chemically selective excitation pulses to target specific carbon types, J-editing pulses to encode J-coupling information, and CPMG detection sequences to separate signals. This segmentation allows the complex analysis task to be broken down into manageable steps that can be optimized independently, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method applies local quality by using chemically selective excitation pulses that target specific chemical environments (aromatic carbons vs. aliphatic carbons with olefins) rather than treating all hydrocarbons uniformly. This selective excitation allows the NMR method to distinguish between different hydrocarbon types based on their local chemical properties, improving identification accuracy without requiring complete spectral analysis of all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If J-coupling spectroscopy is applied to distinguish hydrocarbon types, then molecular structure information can be obtained, but the overlapping signals from aromatic and double-bonded carbons make accurate olefin detection difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation loss in signal differentiationVSAvoidolefin detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method extracts and isolates the J-coupling information from the complex NMR spectrum by using selective excitation pulses that target only the carbon atoms with olefinic protons. This extraction process separates the useful information (olefin detection) from the interfering signals (aromatic carbons), preventing information loss and improving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The J-editing pulse sequence acts as an intermediary that transforms the complex overlapping J-coupling signals into a simplified detection pattern. By encoding J-coupling information during the pulse sequence and using CPMG detection, the method creates an intermediate representation that separates olefin signals from aromatic signals, making accurate differentiation possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If comprehensive NMR analysis is performed to characterize all hydrocarbon components, then complete molecular structure information is obtained, but the analysis time and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis speedVSAvoidcompleteness of hydrocarbon characterization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies partial action by focusing the NMR analysis only on the specific aspect needed for olefin detection rather than performing complete characterization of all hydrocarbon components. The chemically selective excitation and J-editing sequences are designed to extract only the relevant J-coupling information for olefin identification, significantly reducing analysis time while maintaining the required detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the ability to detect and quantify olefins in oil samples, enabling accurate identification of synthetic oil-based mud contamination and improving the characterization of hydrocarbon compositions, thereby aiding in resource management and exploration efficiency in the oilfield.

Implementation Method 1

Nuclear magnetic resonance is a phenomenon occurring in a selected group of nuclei having magnetic nuclear moments, i.e., non-zero spin quantum numbers. When these nuclei are placed in a magnetic field (B0, 'Zeeman field'), they precess around the axis of the B0 field with a specific frequency, the Larmor frequency (ω0), which is a characteristic property of each nuclear species (gyromagnetic ratio, γ) and depends on the magnetic field strength (B0) effective at the location of the nucleus, i.e., ω0=γB0.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNuclear magnetic resonance:

Implementation Method 2

When these nuclei are placed in a magnetic field (B0, 'Zeeman field'), they precess around the axis of the B0 field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectZeeman effect: Zeeman Effect

Implementation Method 3

J-coupling, which is also known as spin-spin or scalar coupling, originates from spin interaction between nuclei through bonding electrons and does not depend on the static magnetic field strength.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJ-coupling:

Implementation Method 4

The 'Fermi contact mechanism' is generally considered to be responsible for J-coupling between nuclear spins. It relies on the fact that an electron in a chemical bond X—Y spends a certain amount of time at the same point in space as, say, nucleus X.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFermi contact mechanism:

Implementation Method 5

Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG)-type detection is conducted at intervals of TE2 around the repeated (π)x signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin echo:

Data Source

PatentUS9863246B2Methods and apparatus for oil sample analysis using J-edit nuclear magnetic resonance
Publication Date: 2018.01.09 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US9863246B2 patent drawing
  • US9863246B2 patent drawing
  • US9863246B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydrocarbon sample is subjected to a chemically selective J-editing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) pulse sequence. Resulting signals are analyzed in order to identify a coupling frequency present in at least one molecule of the hydrocarbon sample. A J-coupling frequency of approximately 150 Hz is indicative of a component having an internal double bonded carbon atom (i.e., an olefin). The presence of an olefin in a hydrocarbon sample can be indicative of the presence of a synthetic based mud (SBM) in the sample.