Jet Impingement Reactor Wall Heat Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Catalytic reactors with annular cross sections are ineffective for heat transfer in cylindrical or full cross-section reactors, as they restrict fluid flow and increase pressure drops, and existing designs fail to consistently enhance heat transfer near the reactor wall.

Innovation Solution

A catalytic reactor design featuring a core and casing structure, where the core allows axial and radial fluid flow with perforated channels and the casing directs fluid to impinge the reactor wall at an angle, promoting heat transfer through radially arrayed channels with varying porosity and hydraulic diameters, enhancing heat transfer coefficients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If parallel stacks of corrugated sheets are used at alternating inclinations, then fluid mixing is enhanced, but heat transfer effectiveness near the reactor wall is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid mixingVSAvoidheat transfer near reactor wall
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into two distinct functional zones: a core region with corrugated sheets for mixing and a peripheral region with jet impingement structures for heat transfer. This segmentation allows each zone to optimize its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different structural configurations are applied to different locations within the reactor. The core uses corrugated sheets inclined at angles to promote mixing, while the periphery uses radially arrayed channels to direct jets at the reactor wall for enhanced heat transfer, matching structure to local functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If channels are arranged parallel to reactor cross section, then structural simplicity is maintained, but heat transfer consistency near the reactor wall is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidheat transfer consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The channels are arranged radially rather than parallel to the cross-section, curving toward the reactor wall. This radial configuration ensures that jet channels consistently impinge the reactor wall across all angular positions, providing uniform heat transfer enhancement while maintaining reasonable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Quantity of substance

If extensive fluid flow parallel to reactor wall is used, then fluid circulation is promoted, but boundary layer destruction is ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid circulationVSAvoidboundary layer destruction
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

Jet impingement technology is employed to create high-velocity fluid streams that directly impact the reactor wall. The hydraulic design of radially arrayed channels directs jets at optimal angles to simultaneously achieve boundary layer destruction and sustained fluid circulation through the reactor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively increases heat transfer throughout the reactor volume, particularly near the reactor wall, while minimizing pressure drops, and is suitable for steam reforming and catalytic converters, prolonging catalyst life by improving cooling efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Jet impingement of a fluid onto a solid surface is known to increase the heat transfer coefficient near the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet impingement: Jet

Implementation Method 2

increase the heat transfer coefficient near the wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

provide mixing of process fluid by enhancing turbulence throughout a reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 4

The obliquely inclined corrugations induce a lateral component to the fluid velocity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS7976783B2Reactor with jet impingment heat transfer
Publication Date: 2011.07.12 ZONEFLOW REACTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US7976783B2 patent drawing
  • US7976783B2 patent drawing
  • US7976783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A catalytic reactor containing a core structure near the reactor axis and a casing structure near the reactor wall, the two structures differing from each other to promote catalysis and heat transfer, respectively. The casing contains a multiplicity of first devices for directing fluid centrifugally to impinge a reactor wall and second devices for permitting fluid to flow away from a reactor wall as the fluid flows from the inlet to the outlet of the reactor.