Jigsaw Baseplate and Lighting Layout for Safer Narrow-Space Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing jigsaws face issues with time-consuming blade removal during breaks, bulky structure causing inflexible operation, inability to stand on a workbench, inadequate lighting for clear cutting visibility, and difficulty operating in narrow spaces due to bulky design and misplaced lighting units.

Innovation Solution

A jigsaw design featuring a compact body structure with a baseplate assembly that allows standing, eccentric lighting unit for clear cutting visibility, and ergonomic grips for comfortable handling, along with a clamping device for secure attachment and a speed regulation assembly for easy operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the saw blade is exposed out of the baseplate for cutting operation, then the cutting function is achieved, but the user safety deteriorates due to risk of injury during breaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operationVSAvoiduser safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The baseplate is segmented into a main body and a removable cover portion. The cover can be detached to expose the saw blade during cutting operations, then reattached during breaks to cover and protect the blade, eliminating safety hazards while maintaining cutting functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cover is pre-positioned on the baseplate to cover the saw blade when the tool is not in use. This preliminary protective action is automatically in place during breaks, preventing user injury without requiring active intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the saw blade is removed from the main machine when not in use, then user safety is improved, but the operational efficiency deteriorates due to time-consuming blade removal during breaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The baseplate is divided into a stationary main body and a removable cover. Only the lightweight cover needs to be detached or repositioned during breaks, rather than removing the entire saw blade from the motor housing, significantly reducing the time and effort required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of removing the dangerous saw blade from the machine during breaks, the invention inverts the approach by keeping the blade in place but covering it with a protective cover. This reverses the traditional safety approach while maintaining both safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If the body is configured with arch-shaped bulky structure with grip far from baseplate, then the hand can pass through for holding, but the operational flexibility deteriorates in narrow spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip comfortVSAvoidoperation in narrow spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The body is segmented into functional modules: the arch-shaped grip portion for hand comfort, the compact motor housing, and the baseplate assembly. This modular segmentation allows the grip to remain comfortable while the overall footprint is reduced for narrow space operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The grip is positioned in the vertical dimension (arch-shaped allowing hand passage) rather than extending horizontally. This dimensional change maintains ergonomic hand placement while reducing the horizontal footprint, enabling operation in narrow spaces between walls or obstacles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Device complexity

If the lighting unit is disposed coaxially with output member, then the structure is simplified, but the cutting visibility deteriorates at some angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelighting structureVSAvoidcutting visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting unit is positioned asymmetrically relative to the output member, specifically at the rear end of the baseplate rather than coaxially. This asymmetric placement creates optimized lighting angles that illuminate the cutting area from multiple perspectives, improving visibility while the lighting unit itself maintains a relatively simple structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The lighting unit is relocated from the axial dimension (coaxial with output member) to the rear dimension of the baseplate. This dimensional relocation allows light to illuminate the cutting area from a rear angle, providing better visibility of the cutting line and workpiece while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

5Illumination intensity

If the lighting unit has relatively small dimensions, then clear irradiation is achieved, but the light coverage range deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclear irradiationVSAvoidlight coverage range
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting unit is positioned at the rear end of the baseplate, utilizing the longitudinal dimension of the baseplate to extend light coverage. This rear positioning allows a compact lighting unit to illuminate a larger area by projecting light forward along the cutting path, achieving both clear irradiation and extended coverage range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The lighting unit is pre-positioned at the rear of the baseplate to illuminate the cutting area before the cut progresses forward. This preliminary lighting action ensures the entire cutting path is visible in advance, effectively extending the coverage range without increasing unit dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

6Area of stationary object

If the lighting unit has relatively large dimensions, then light coverage range is ensured, but clear irradiation deteriorates due to dispersed light

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight coverage rangeVSAvoidclear irradiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting function is segmented from the main body and concentrated into a compact unit at the rear end of the baseplate. This segmentation allows the light source to be small and focused, providing intense clear irradiation, while the rear positioning ensures the light covers the extended cutting area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lighting unit exploits the longitudinal dimension of the baseplate to achieve extended coverage. A compact unit positioned at the rear can illuminate a large area by projecting light forward along the cutting path, eliminating the need for large-dimensional lighting units that would disperse light.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12459102B2Power tool
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 NANJING CHERVON IND
  • US12459102B2 patent drawing
  • US12459102B2 patent drawing
  • US12459102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power tool includes a body, a power assembly, an output member, a clamping device, a battery pack, and a baseplate. The body includes a first body and a second body. The first body includes an upper finger stop portion and a lower finger stop portion that are disposed on a rear sidewall of the first body. The upper finger stop portion is disposed above the second body, and the lower finger stop portion is disposed below the second body. An outer diameter of the second body is greater than or equal to 35 mm and less than or equal to 65 mm. A distance between the upper finger stop portion and the lower finger stop portion along the front and rear direction is ΔL, and −15 mm≤ΔL≤30 mm.