Dynamic JIT Trace Sizing for Garbage Collection Overhead

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tracing just-in-time compilers face inefficiencies in determining an optimal trace size, leading to increased garbage collection overhead and performance degradation, particularly in memory-intensive programs.

Innovation Solution

A method for dynamic trace sizing that profiles program traces to estimate effective and maximum trace sizes, considering garbage collection and mutator times, allowing for runtime determination of the optimal trace size to minimize overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the trace size is increased to improve program execution time, then more code is compiled and execution speed improves, but garbage collection overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram execution timeVSAvoidgarbage collection overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic trace sizing by introducing a feedback mechanism that monitors program characteristics (such as allocation rates and execution patterns) and adjusts the trace size limit accordingly. The system transitions from a static trace size configuration to a dynamic one where the trace size adapts based on runtime observations, resolving the contradiction by making the trace size flexible rather than fixed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms that collect information about program behavior (allocation patterns, execution frequency, garbage collection frequency) and use this information to adjust the trace size limit. This closed-loop control system continuously optimizes the trace size to balance execution speed and garbage collection overhead based on actual program characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the trace size is decreased to reduce garbage collection overhead, then memory management becomes more efficient, but less code is compiled and execution time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegarbage collection overheadVSAvoidprogram execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the trace size limit based on observed program characteristics rather than using a fixed small size. When the program exhibits patterns suitable for larger traces (such as stable allocation rates), the system increases the trace size to improve execution speed, thereby resolving the contradiction between small trace size and execution performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the trace size parameter dynamically based on program characteristics such as allocation rates, execution patterns, and garbage collection frequency. This parameter adjustment allows the system to optimize both garbage collection overhead and execution time by finding the appropriate trace size for different program states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a fixed trace size limit is used to simplify compiler design, then implementation becomes easier, but it cannot adapt to different program characteristics and performance is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompiler implementation complexityVSAvoidprogram execution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static trace size limit into a dynamic parameter that adapts to different program characteristics. The compiler implementation includes mechanisms to observe program behavior and adjust the trace size accordingly, maintaining ease of implementation while significantly improving execution efficiency through adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The compiler system performs self-adjustment by monitoring its own performance characteristics and automatically modifying the trace size limit without external intervention. This self-service mechanism allows the system to optimize its own performance while maintaining relatively simple implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12561228B2Optimal just-in-time trace sizing for virtual machines
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12561228B2 patent drawing
  • US12561228B2 patent drawing
  • US12561228B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Dynamic trace sizing for tracing just-in-time compilation is provided. A trace of a program is generated during a tracing phase of the just-in-time compilation. The trace of the program is profiled to determine an estimated effective trace size prior to compiling the trace. Additional profiling is performed to determine a garbage collection time and consequently a total execution time of the program based on the estimated effective trace size determined prior to compiling the trace. It is determined whether to continue formation of the trace or trigger termination of the trace based on the garbage collection time of the program. Triggering the termination of the trace dynamically sizes the trace at runtime of the program.