Jittering Switching Frequency Power Controller EMI Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Switching-mode power supplies in quasi-resonance mode can cause switching frequencies to stabilize at a single frequency or toggle between two frequencies, potentially inducing electromagnetic interference (EMI) issues.

Innovation Solution

A power controller that generates a PWM signal to control a power switch, jittering the maximum switching frequency within a variation range centered at an average switching frequency, while maintaining a constant variation ratio, to spread radiation energy and reduce EMI.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If valley switching is implemented in quasi-resonance mode to reduce switching loss, then conversion efficiency is improved, but switching frequency stabilizes at a single frequency or toggles between two frequencies, causing electromagnetic interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the switching frequency variable rather than fixed. A jittering mechanism is introduced that dynamically varies the switching frequency around a nominal value, preventing the frequency from stabilizing at a single point or toggling between two fixed frequencies. This dynamic frequency variation spreads the electromagnetic radiation energy across a frequency range, reducing EMI while maintaining the efficiency benefits of valley switching in quasi-resonance mode

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the frequency parameter from a fixed value to a varying value within a specified range. By introducing frequency jitter that varies the switching frequency around a nominal frequency, the system maintains average frequency performance while preventing harmful frequency stabilization. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by allowing efficient switching while reducing electromagnetic interference through frequency distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If switching frequency is jittered to spread radiation energy and reduce EMI, then electromagnetic interference is reduced, but switching frequency varies which may affect conversion efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic interferenceVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by introducing small, controlled frequency variations (jitter) rather than large frequency changes. The jittering mechanism varies the switching frequency within a limited range around the nominal frequency, providing enough variation to spread electromagnetic radiation energy and reduce EMI, while keeping the variations small enough to maintain conversion efficiency. This partial action resolves the contradiction by achieving EMI reduction without excessive frequency deviation that would harm efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10924005B2Switching-mode power supplies and power controllers capable of jittering switching frequency
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 LEADTREND TECH
  • US10924005B2 patent drawing
  • US10924005B2 patent drawing
  • US10924005B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power controller provides a PWM signal to a power switch in response to a compensation signal to control the power switch, the compensation signal generated in response to an output voltage of a power converter. The power controller is configured to provide a maximum switching frequency limiting a switching frequency of the PWM signal. The power controller jitters the maximum switching frequency, making the maximum switching frequency have a first average switching frequency and a first variation ratio when the compensation signal is a first compensation value, and have a second average switching frequency and a second variation ratio when the compensation signal is a second compensation value. The first average switching frequency is higher than the second average switching frequency, and the second variation ratio is larger than the first variation ratio.