Job Scheduling Maturity Model for Centralized Process Standardization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current job scheduling technologies lack standardization, leading to inefficient and organization-specific processes that hinder uniform implementation of centralized job scheduling, requiring custom adjustments for each organization or unit, which complicates data processing across multiple software applications.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that define job scheduling maturity levels, assessing and improving organizational processes by transitioning from one maturity level to another, with standard sets of people, processes, and technology for each level, allowing for structured maturation operations and verification to enhance job scheduling efficiency and alignment with business objectives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If individual schedulers are used for each software application, then each application can be scheduled independently, but it becomes difficult to correlate data processing across multiple software applications

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndependent scheduling capabilityVSAvoidData processing correlation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual application schedulers into a single centralized job scheduling service that manages all applications uniformly. This centralization enables comprehensive data processing correlation across applications while maintaining standardized scheduling processes, resolving the contradiction between independent scheduling and data correlation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If centralized job scheduling software is implemented, then uniform implementation across applications is achieved, but processes may not be aligned with organization's business objectives

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUniform implementationVSAvoidBusiness alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic maturity model with multiple levels (Initial, Repeatable, Defined, Managed, Optimizing) that allows the centralized scheduling system to evolve and adapt to organizational business objectives. This dynamic framework enables the system to maintain uniform implementation while progressively improving business alignment through structured maturation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If different organizations use diverse job scheduling processes, then each organization can customize to its needs, but a single provider must adjust functional requirements for each organization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveOrganizational customizationVSAvoidProvider configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal centralized job scheduling service that can be deployed across different organizations with standardized processes. The maturity model framework provides a common language and structured approach that reduces provider configuration complexity while still allowing organizations to progress through defined maturity levels that accommodate their specific needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If current job scheduling processes are inefficient or not aligned with business, then implementing central job scheduling software provides little aid, but standardizing processes reduces flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveJob scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidProcess flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing a structured maturity model with defined levels and maturation operations before implementing centralized scheduling. This preparatory framework guides organizations through systematic process improvements, ensuring that efficiency gains are achieved through structured maturation rather than rigid standardization, thus maintaining adaptability while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8886551B2Centralized job scheduling maturity model
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 CA TECH INC
  • US8886551B2 patent drawing
  • US8886551B2 patent drawing
  • US8886551B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides systems and methods for improving the job scheduling structure of an organization by raising the job scheduling maturity level of the organization. In one embodiment, a plurality of job management maturity levels may be defined and arranged in a hierarchy. Current job management information may then be received from the organization regarding the organization's current job management structure. Using this current job management information, a current job management maturity level may be determined from the plurality of maturity levels. A target maturity level may then be selected from the plurality of job management maturity levels. One or more maturation operations may be devised that, when implemented, shift the organization to the target maturity level. The one or more maturation operations may then be performed, thus, shifting the organization to the target maturity level.