Joint Prosthesis Stress Distribution via Segmented Inserts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current prosthetic devices for joint replacement often compromise the natural joint mechanism, cause unnatural motion arcs, and can irritate or restrict ligaments, leading to limited effectiveness and mobility in treating osteoarthritis.

Innovation Solution

A prosthetic system comprising plates shaped to conform to joint surfaces, accommodating native ligaments and allowing for a desired range of motion by distributing stress and maintaining physiological strain, while minimizing interaction with ligaments and muscles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional joint replacement surgery is performed, then symptom relief is provided, but the natural joint mechanism is compromised and mobility is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesymptom reliefVSAvoidmobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis is divided into separate modular components including a femoral component, tibial component, and interchangeable inserts. This segmentation allows the natural joint mechanism to be partially preserved while providing symptom relief, and enables customization of mobility characteristics through different insert selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of replacing the entire joint as in traditional arthroplasty, the invention inserts a stress-distributing device into the joint space that works with the native joint surfaces. This inverted approach preserves the natural articulation while addressing the pathological stress distribution, thereby maintaining mobility while providing symptom relief.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Loss of energy

If energy absorption implants are used in the knee joint, then energy is absorbed during extension, but the natural arc of motion is altered and ligament interaction is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorptionVSAvoidarc of motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis introduces an intermediary stress-distributing component that mediates between the femoral and tibial surfaces. This intermediary absorbs and redistributes energy during extension without significantly altering the natural arc of motion, as it works within the existing joint geometry rather than imposing a new mechanical pathway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The energy absorption function is localized to specific regions of the prosthesis, particularly in the tibial insert where stress concentration occurs during extension. This localized approach allows energy dissipation without requiring global modification of the joint's motion characteristics, preserving the natural arc of motion while providing protective energy absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the implant is positioned to provide full range of motion, then mobility is improved, but ligament irritation and restriction may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange of motionVSAvoidligament irritation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis employs dynamic design features including conforming surfaces that adapt to the natural joint geometry and motion patterns. The tibial insert and femoral component are designed to move together through the full range of motion while maintaining optimal contact, thereby achieving improved mobility without creating fixed points of irritation that would affect the ligaments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The prosthesis provides partial stress relief rather than complete load bearing, allowing the native joint structures including ligaments to remain engaged and functional. This partial action approach enables full range of motion by not over-constraining the joint, while still providing sufficient stress distribution to prevent ligament irritation and damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11246635B2Prosthesis
Publication Date: 2022.02.15 KUMAR PRANESH
  • US11246635B2 patent drawing
  • US11246635B2 patent drawing
  • US11246635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common disease affecting human joints. Mechanical stress through the joint is one of the most important independent etiological factors. The present invention provides a prosthesis that by passes some of the stress from the joint without destroying the joint surface. It allows may provide a full range of joint movement, while sharing the load with the physiological joint, thereby maintaining the viability of the physiological joint surface. In addition, the prosthesis can accommodate native soft tissue structures in or around the joint, such as ligaments.