Joint Test Bench for Multi-Axial Weathering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current test instruments for joint fillings in civil engineering are inadequate for long-term functionality testing under complex stress, as they primarily focus on short-term aging and do not accurately record usage behavior or durability under constant, complex stress conditions.

Innovation Solution

A joint test rig comprising a weathering chamber and a mechanical stress unit that applies non-parallel forces to a test specimen with a joint dimensioned to simulate real-world stress conditions, allowing for realistic investigation of joint behavior under long-term, complex mechanical and chemical stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current test instruments are used for joint fillings, then short-term aging behavior can be tested, but long-term functionality and durability under complex stress conditions cannot be accurately assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term functionality assessmentVSAvoidcomplex stress condition simulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple stress application capabilities into a single test instrument. The device integrates at least two actuators that can apply different types of mechanical stress (tensile, compressive, shear) simultaneously or sequentially to the joint filler specimen, enabling comprehensive long-term durability testing under complex stress conditions that mimic real-world usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The test instrument employs dynamic stress application with controllable motion profiles. The actuators can vary stress magnitude, frequency, and direction over time to simulate realistic loading conditions. This dynamic capability allows the device to assess long-term functionality under varying stress states rather than static or single-mode loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If joint length is increased to at least 25 times joint width for realistic simulation, then measurement accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint behavior measurement accuracyVSAvoidtest specimen configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test specimen is segmented into distinct components: two sub-bodies connected by the joint filler. This segmentation allows the joint region to be clearly defined and isolated for measurement while maintaining the recommended length-to-width ratio of at least 25:1. The sub-bodies can be independently positioned and loaded, simplifying the overall device configuration despite the extended joint length requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If multiple non-parallel stress directions are applied, then durability assessment under complex stress improves, but device complexity and operation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability under complex stressVSAvoidmulti-directional stress application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The test instrument is designed with multi-functional actuators capable of applying stress in multiple directions. Each actuator can operate independently to apply forces at different angles, allowing the device to simulate various complex stress states (uniaxial, biaxial, shear, combined loading) using a standardized configuration. This universality simplifies operation compared to requiring separate specialized devices for each stress type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables realistic simulation of joint behavior and durability analysis, preventing incorrect assessments and costly damage by accurately simulating the long-term performance and aging of joint fillings under various stress conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The test specimen can be subjected by means of the mechanical stress unit to mechanical forces of up to at least 50 kN or even at least 100 kN in at least one, typically at least two, and even more typically three, non-parallel directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

A joint test rig, in particular an aging or fatigue test rig, for the realistic investigation of the functionality, performance characteristics and/or aging and fatigue behavior of joints

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWeathering: Weathering

Data Source

PatentEP3534145B1Joint test bench
Publication Date: 2023.08.02 BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUT VERTRETEN DURCH DEN BUNDESMINIST FUR WIRTSCHAFT & ENERGIE
  • EP3534145B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3534145B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3534145B1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

A joint test rig (100-500) comprises a weathering chamber (150), a mechanical stress unit (160, 260, 260', 360, 460, 560), and a test specimen (10-40) held by the mechanical stress unit (160, 260, 260', 360, 460, 560) and arranged in the weathering chamber (150). The test specimen can be mechanically stressed by the mechanical stress unit in at least two directions (x, y, z) that are not parallel to each other. The test specimen (10-40) has a joint (11, 11') with a joint width (b, b') and a joint length (L, L') that is at least 25 times greater than the joint width (b, b').