State Consistent Replication via Journal-Based Snapshotting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current backup systems are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and inadequate for 24/7 networks, especially when dealing with frequently changing data, and they often lose file structure during storage, making data retrieval difficult and costly.

Innovation Solution

The system employs state consistent replication by generating snapshots, using a distributed metadata store, and performing asynchronous replication correctness validation to efficiently identify and transfer changed data, minimizing network bandwidth and enabling rapid recovery with snapshots and version history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If incremental backups are used to reduce data transfer, then network bandwidth usage is reduced, but data consistency across multiple backup systems becomes difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork bandwidth usageVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a journal file as an intermediary mechanism that records all data changes in a centralized location. Backup systems read from this journal to determine what data to transfer, ensuring all systems have a consistent view of changes without needing to exchange complex metadata directly with each other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where backup systems continuously monitor the journal file for new entries and automatically initiate transfers when changes are detected. This feedback loop ensures data consistency is maintained across distributed backup systems without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple parallel I/O operations are performed to increase throughput, then backup speed is improved, but coordination complexity and potential for inconsistent states increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup throughputVSAvoidI/O coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by taking snapshots of data before backup operations begin. This establishes a known good state that all parallel I/O operations can reference, allowing multiple threads to read and write simultaneously without complex coordination, as they all operate from the same baseline snapshot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The backup process is segmented into distinct phases: snapshot creation, journal reading, parallel data transfer, and validation. Each phase can be executed by multiple threads independently, reducing coordination complexity while maintaining high throughput during the parallel transfer phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If data is stored sequentially on tape media, then storage capacity is maximized, but file structure is lost and retrieval time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoiddata retrieval time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a copy of the data structure in the form of a manifest file that is stored alongside the sequential tape data. This manifest contains metadata about file structures, locations, and relationships, allowing rapid retrieval of specific files without having to sequentially search through entire tape contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The manifest file acts as an intermediary index between the sequential tape storage and the user's retrieval requests. Instead of directly searching sequential tape data, the system queries the manifest first to locate desired files, then retrieves only those specific files from the tape, dramatically reducing retrieval time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If complete data transfers are performed to ensure data integrity, then backup reliability is improved, but time consumption and network bandwidth usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup integrityVSAvoidbackup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the changed portions of data by reading the journal file to identify what has modified since the last backup. Instead of transferring complete datasets, the system extracts and transfers only the necessary increments, maintaining data integrity through journal-based change tracking while dramatically reducing transfer time and bandwidth usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9547559B2Systems and methods for state consistent replication
Publication Date: 2017.01.17 ARCSERVE LLC
  • US9547559B2 patent drawing
  • US9547559B2 patent drawing
  • US9547559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for state consistent replication of client data set on a client computer by generating a snapshot of the client data set on a local volume; synchronizing with a remote server volume corresponding to the local volume to create a copy of the client data set on the remote server; performing a master to slave replication of the data set; and taking a snapshot of the server data set to create a mirror of the snapshot of the client data set on the server.