Journal Sleeve Weight Reduction via Local Quality and Dimensionality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hydrodynamic fluid film journal bearings have thick cylindrical journal sleeves that add significant weight, which is a critical design concern, especially in aerospace applications, and can cause damage to O-rings during assembly.

Innovation Solution

A journal sleeve with reduced wall thickness in specific regions, featuring a grooved design with frusto-conical tapered portions and chamfered regions to minimize weight and prevent O-ring damage, along with O-ring lands for engagement, allowing for a tailored profile that maintains structural integrity and facilitates smooth assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the journal sleeve wall thickness is increased to provide stiffness, then the structural integrity is improved, but the weight of the bearing increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidbearing weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The journal sleeve employs varying wall thickness along its length, with thicker sections at the ends and a reduced thickness in the middle section. This local quality variation provides sufficient structural integrity at the ends while reducing overall weight, resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a uniform cylindrical geometry to a more complex three-dimensional profile with varying wall thickness. This dimensional change allows the sleeve to maintain strength where needed while reducing material usage and weight in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Weight of stationary object

If the journal sleeve wall thickness is reduced to decrease weight, then the bearing weight is reduced, but the structural integrity and stiffness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing weightVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The journal sleeve employs varying wall thickness along its length, with thicker sections at the ends and a reduced thickness in the middle section. This local quality variation provides sufficient structural integrity at the ends while reducing overall weight, resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If the journal sleeve has a uniform cylindrical shape, then the manufacturing is simplified, but the weight is excessive and O-rings may be damaged during assembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidbearing weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The journal sleeve employs varying wall thickness along its length, with thicker sections at the ends and a reduced thickness in the middle section. This local quality variation provides sufficient structural integrity at the ends while reducing overall weight, resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The chamfered regions with tapered portions provide curved transition surfaces that guide O-rings during assembly, preventing damage while maintaining manufacturing feasibility. This geometric modification balances manufacturing ease with assembly safety and weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Weight of stationary object

If the journal sleeve wall thickness is reduced with grooves and tapered portions, then the weight is reduced and assembly is facilitated, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing weightVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The journal sleeve is segmented into distinct regions with different wall thicknesses - thicker end sections and a thinner middle section separated by grooves. This segmentation allows weight reduction in critical areas while maintaining structural integrity, balancing complexity and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chamfered regions with tapered portions provide curved transition surfaces that guide O-rings during assembly, preventing damage while maintaining manufacturing feasibility. This geometric modification balances manufacturing ease with assembly safety and weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP1980761B1Weight reduction for journal air bearing
Publication Date: 2011.09.14 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • EP1980761B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1980761B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A hydrodynamic fluid film journal bearing system (10) includes a journal sleeve (12) and one or more hydrodynamic fluid film foils positioned at least partially within the journal sleeve. The journal sleeve defines an inner diameter surface, an outer diameter surface (14), a wall thickness between the inner and outer diameter surfaces, and opposite first (18) and second (20) ends. The wall thickness of the journal sleeve is reduced at a first region located between the first and second ends, and a chamfered region (66) is formed on the outer diameter surface of the journal sleeve between a first o-ring land (62) and the first end (18) of the journal sleeve (12).