Adjustable Jump Training Apparatus with Cushioned Arm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional vertical jump training apparatuses are expensive, require multiple weights and heavy materials, making them difficult to move and store, and pose a risk of injury due to their hard construction.

Innovation Solution

A floor-standing or wall-mounted jump training apparatus comprising a sleeve, pipe, and arm, with adjustable features such as weight holders, cushioning, and secure fastening mechanisms, allowing for customizable stability and safety through the use of weights and cushioned surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional jumping training apparatus uses heavy materials like steel to provide stability, then the stability is improved, but the difficulty of moving and storage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus is divided into separate components including a base, vertical support, horizontal support, and weight platform that can be assembled and disassembled. This segmentation allows the apparatus to be stable when assembled but easy to move and store when disassembled, resolving the contradiction between stability and portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus uses adjustable components such as the vertical support that can be positioned at different heights and the weight platform that can be adjusted to various positions. This dynamic adjustability allows the apparatus to adapt to different training needs while maintaining stability through proper configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If traditional jumping training apparatus uses hard steel construction to provide structural integrity, then the strength is improved, but the risk of injury increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidinjury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different parts of the apparatus have different material properties suited to their specific functions. The base and support structures use strong materials for structural integrity, while the horizontal support and weight platform use cushioned or softer materials to reduce injury risk during athlete contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The horizontal support is covered with a cushion that provides protective padding before the athlete makes contact. This beforehand cushioning reduces the risk of injury while maintaining the structural strength of the underlying framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Stability of the object's composition

If traditional jumping training apparatus uses multiple weights to provide stability, then the stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The weight platform serves multiple functions: it provides the jumping surface for athletes, acts as a counterweight for stability when weights are added, and allows for adjustable weight configuration. This multi-functionality reduces device complexity by combining several functions into a single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus allows dynamic adjustment of weights on the platform, enabling the same structure to provide different levels of stability for different athletes and training phases without requiring multiple fixed configurations or complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If traditional jumping training apparatus uses expensive materials and construction to ensure durability, then the reliability is improved, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented design allows each component to be manufactured separately using cost-effective materials and methods, then assembled into a durable complete apparatus. This reduces overall manufacturing cost while maintaining reliability through proper component selection and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus uses composite construction combining different materials such as metal for structural components and cushioning materials for safety surfaces. This composite approach provides durability and reliability while controlling costs by using each material only where its specific properties are needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS7955222B1Vertical jump training apparatus
Publication Date: 2011.06.07 HERNANDEZ RICK S
  • US7955222B1 patent drawing
  • US7955222B1 patent drawing
  • US7955222B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A jump training apparatus including a sleeve, a pipe, and an arm. Floor standing embodiments may also include a base that may be operably connected to a weight holder. Wall mounted embodiments may include a mounting bracket, mounting plate, or mounting clamps, for example. At least a portion of the pipe may be slideably inserted into the sleeve. The pipe may be operably connected to the arm. The vertical height of the arm may be adjusted through the movement of the pipe relative to the sleeve. According to certain embodiments, when the arm is positioned at the desired vertical height, the position of the pipe may be secured by operably engaging a fastening element. At least a portion of the arm may be covered by a cushion.