Electrical Junction Box Rib Layout for Thermal Warping Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increase in the number and size of electronic components in electrical junction boxes due to functional diversification in vehicles leads to warping issues caused by thermal expansion differences, which are not adequately addressed in existing designs.

Innovation Solution

The electrical junction box incorporates inner and outer ribs with specific thickness and orientation configurations to offset thermal contraction differences, particularly in the second wall, thereby suppressing warping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the number of electronic components is increased to accommodate more functions, then the functionality is improved, but thermal expansion differences cause warping in the junction box

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidwarping
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing ribs at specific locations (end portions of the second wall) rather than uniformly throughout the structure. These localized ribs create regions of different rigidity to counteract thermal expansion differences at critical areas where warping occurs, allowing the overall structure to maintain stability while accommodating increased functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetry by positioning ribs asymmetrically at end portions of the second wall rather than distributing them uniformly. This asymmetric arrangement creates differential rigidity that specifically addresses thermal expansion issues at the ends of the housing, where warping is most likely to occur due to heat generation from electronic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Quantity of substance

If the size of the junction box is increased to accommodate more components, then the component capacity is improved, but the structural stability deteriorates due to heat-induced warping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent capacityVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than increasing the overall size uniformly, the patent introduces localized ribs at end portions of the second wall. These ribs provide targeted reinforcement at critical areas susceptible to warping, allowing the junction box to maintain larger size for component capacity while preserving structural stability through localized rigidity enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the second wall by introducing ribs that divide the continuous wall structure into distinct regions. This segmentation creates zones of different rigidity, with the ribbed end portions providing enhanced stability against thermal warping while the rest of the structure maintains the necessary size for component accommodation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If ribs are added to the second wall to suppress warping, then the structural stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarping suppressionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent minimizes device complexity by applying ribs only at specific end portions of the second wall rather than throughout the entire structure. This localized approach provides adequate warping suppression with minimal additional structural elements, avoiding unnecessary complexity while maintaining structural stability at critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by providing ribs only where most needed (at end portions of the second wall) rather than uniformly across the entire structure. This partial reinforcement is sufficient to suppress warping caused by thermal expansion differences, achieving the desired stability effect with minimal structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces warping by balancing thermal contraction disparities, maintaining structural integrity and reducing the overall size of the junction box.

Implementation Method 1

a difference in contraction that has occurred between the second wall and the inner rib caused by a difference in amount of heat generated during operation remains is offset by a difference in contraction that has occurred between the second wall and the outer rib

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS20250330001A1Electrical junction box
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 SUMITOMO WIRING SYSTEMS LTD
  • US20250330001A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330001A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330001A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an electrical junction box that includes a bottom wall that comes into contact with a mount target such as a battery pack, and a ceiling wall opposing the bottom wall, an inner rib protrudes from an inner surface of the ceiling wall, and a second outer rib protrudes from an outer side surface that is opposite to the inner surface of the ceiling wall.