Jurisdiction-Aware Vehicle Navigation Using Camera-Based Rule Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle navigation systems struggle to effectively integrate visual information from cameras with other sensory data, such as GPS and sensor data, to make accurate navigational decisions in complex environments.

Innovation Solution

The system uses multiple cameras to provide autonomous vehicle navigation features, analyzing images to identify navigational states and determining navigational rules specific to the vehicle's jurisdiction, thereby informing navigational responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system integrates multiple sensory data sources (cameras, GPS, sensors) to improve navigational decision accuracy, then the measurement precision and reliability of navigation are improved, but the device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigational decision accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex navigation task into separate functional modules: image capture devices for visual data, GPS receivers for location data, sensors for environmental data, and a processing unit that integrates these separate data streams. Each module handles specific sensory inputs independently before integration, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive data collection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing unit acts as an intermediary that receives and integrates data from multiple sensory sources (cameras, GPS, sensors). This central intermediary component coordinates the fusion of heterogeneous data types, transforming complex multi-source input into unified navigational decisions without requiring direct complex interactions between all sensor components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the system processes and analyzes visual information from cameras in real-time to identify navigational states and rules, then the responsiveness and productivity of navigation are improved, but the use of energy and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigational response speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously capturing images and pre-processing visual data even before specific navigational decisions are required. The processing unit maintains a ready state with pre-analyzed visual information, enabling faster response to changing conditions without requiring intensive real-time computation for every decision moment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic action through continuous image capture at defined intervals and periodic analysis of navigational states. Rather than constant high-intensity processing, the system analyzes visual information at periodic intervals sufficient for safe navigation, reducing peak energy consumption while maintaining responsive decision-making capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system identifies jurisdiction-specific navigational rules based on location analysis, then the adaptability to different environments is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring location context increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoidlocation context detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The processing unit performs multiple functions: it processes image data for visual navigation, analyzes GPS coordinates for location identification, detects environmental features for context understanding, and determines jurisdiction-specific rules. This multi-functional processing capability allows the single system to handle diverse navigational challenges across different jurisdictions without requiring separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where detected location context and environmental features are continuously fed back to adjust navigational rule application. The processing unit compares observed environmental characteristics with stored jurisdictional rule sets, refining location identification and rule selection through iterative feedback loops that improve accuracy over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3545265B1Rules-based navigation
Publication Date: 2025.01.22 MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD
  • EP3545265B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3545265B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3545265B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

In one embodiment, a navigation system for a host vehicle may comprise, at least one processing device. The processing device may be programmed to receive a plurality of images representative of an environment of the host vehicle. The processing device may also be programmed to analyze the plurality of images to identify at least one navigational state of the host vehicle. The processing device may also be programmed to identify a jurisdiction based on at least one indicator of a location of the host vehicle, the at least one indicator based at least in part on an analysis of the plurality of images. The processing device may also be programmed to determine at least one navigational rule specific to the identified jurisdiction. The processing device may also be programmed to cause a navigational change based on the identified navigational state and based on the determined at least one navigational rule.