JVM Heap Memory Tuning via ML Predictive Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current JVM heap memory tuning approaches rely heavily on inflexible and expensive domain experts, leading to issues such as out of memory errors when the heap is too small and significant GC overhead when it is too large, affecting system performance and stability.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a predictive model trained with historical application data to generate memory tuning recommendations for JVM heap memory, using a feature vector constructed from application data to optimize memory settings and reduce GC overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If heap memory is set too small, then memory utilization is improved, but system reliability deteriorates due to out of memory errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheap memory sizeVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes heap memory parameters by using machine learning models to predict optimal memory settings based on historical application data and current system conditions, replacing static configuration with adaptive parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automating the memory tuning process through predictive models that automatically analyze application behavior patterns and generate optimization recommendations without requiring manual domain expert intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If heap memory is set too large, then system reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to significant GC overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts heap memory parameters by predicting optimal memory allocation based on application workload patterns, enabling the system to maintain reliability while minimizing garbage collection overhead through data-driven parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring application performance metrics and garbage collection behavior, using this information to refine predictive models and adjust memory settings for optimal balance between reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If domain experts are used for memory tuning, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical/expert-based tuning process with an automated computational system using machine learning models that analyze historical data and generate optimization recommendations, eliminating the need for manual domain expert intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model of application behavior by training predictive models on historical application data, allowing the system to simulate and predict memory requirements without requiring actual expert analysis of each specific case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If manual memory tuning is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning accuracyVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training predictive models on historical application data collected from production environments, so that when tuning is needed, the system can quickly generate recommendations without requiring time-consuming manual analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces time-consuming manual tuning processes with automated machine learning models that can rapidly analyze application characteristics and generate optimized memory settings, maintaining precision while dramatically reducing the time required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11340924B2Machine-learning based heap memory tuning
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11340924B2 patent drawing
  • US11340924B2 patent drawing
  • US11340924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach for JAVA Virtual Machine (JVM) heap memory tuning, one or more computer processors obtain a feature vector of an application running on the JVM. The one or more computer processors input the feature vector to a predictive model trained with historical application data collected in one or more production environments. The one or more computer processors receive an output of the predictive model based on the feature vector with at least one memory tuning recommendation for the JVM. The one or more computer processors tune the memory of the JVM based on the at least one memory tuning recommendation.