Minimum Cost Network Design with k-Coverage Approximation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to efficiently design minimum-cost networks with large numbers of network elements that provide k-coverage, requiring excessive computational resources and time to find accurate solutions to the k-set covering problem.

Innovation Solution

The development of hybrid heuristics such as GRASP with path-relinking, Lagrangian heuristic, and Greedy Lagrangian Heuristic (GLH) and GRASP Lagrangian Heuristic (LAGRASP) to approximate solutions to the k-set covering problem, allowing for the selection of the least-cost network elements that provide k-coverage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If exact methods are used to solve the k-set covering problem, then solution accuracy is improved, but computational resources and time increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the original k-set covering problem into a Lagrangian relaxation problem by introducing Lagrange multipliers and modifying the objective function parameters. This parameter transformation allows the problem to be solved more efficiently while maintaining solution quality through iterative refinement of the Lagrange multipliers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces Lagrange multipliers as intermediary variables that mediate between the conflicting requirements of solution accuracy and computational efficiency. These multipliers act as a bridge, allowing the algorithm to converge to accurate solutions without requiring exhaustive search of all possible network configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of network elements increases, then network coverage capability is improved, but problem complexity and computational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverage capabilityVSAvoidproblem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large-scale k-set covering problem into smaller subproblems by utilizing the Lagrangian relaxation structure. This segmentation allows the computational burden to be distributed and managed more effectively, enabling the handling of networks with large numbers of elements without exponential increase in complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the problem from the original combinatorial optimization dimension into the Lagrangian dual space, adding a new dimensional perspective. This dimensionality change transforms the intractable combinatorial problem into a more manageable form that can be solved efficiently even as network size increases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If redundant coverage (k-coverage) is required, then network reliability is improved, but network cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through iterative updates of Lagrange multipliers based on the coverage constraints. This feedback mechanism allows the algorithm to learn from constraint violations and progressively refine the solution to achieve the desired k-coverage level at minimum cost, rather than requiring manual trial and error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively activating only those network elements necessary to achieve the k-coverage requirement. Rather than deploying all potential elements, the Lagrangian relaxation approach identifies and activates only the minimal subset needed, reducing overall network cost while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8468043B2Networks with redundant points of presence using approximation methods and systems
Publication Date: 2013.06.18 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8468043B2 patent drawing
  • US8468043B2 patent drawing
  • US8468043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and products determine minimum cost networks. A k-fold coverage formulation is applied to potential network elements having cost and coverage parameters. Iterative heuristics are used to find an optimal solution to the k-set coverage formulation. The approximate solutions to the k-set coverage formulation are then used to select at least some of the potential network elements for use in a minimum cost network.