K-Shaped Frame Support Assembly for Impact Force Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle propulsion systems face challenges in maintaining rigidity and reducing deformation, particularly around the battery compartment, during frontal impacts, as existing frame structures are prone to compression stress and deformation.

Innovation Solution

The use of a frame assembly comprising elongated frame rails, crossbeams, and support members that transmit force applied during impacts, reducing compression stress on the frame rails and minimizing deformation by distributing the force throughout the vehicle components, including a K-shaped configuration of support members and crossbeams that provide additional rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a traditional frame structure is used, then the device complexity is low, but the rigidity and resistance to deformation during impacts is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe rigidityVSAvoidframe structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure is segmented into multiple components including frame rails, crossbeams, and support members arranged in a K-shaped configuration. This segmentation allows each component to specifically address different stress patterns during impacts, with the crossbeams and support members working together to distribute and manage compression stresses effectively throughout the frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If the frame structure is simplified, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the ability to transmit and distribute impact forces is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe assembly easeVSAvoidimpact force distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The frame assembly merges multiple structural elements (frame rails, crossbeams, and support members) into an integrated K-shaped configuration that functions as a unified force distribution system. This merging allows impact forces to be transmitted and distributed through the combined structure, achieving effective force management while maintaining manufacturability through standardized component assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If additional support members are added to reduce deformation, then the structural integrity is improved, but the weight of the frame increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidframe weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure implements local quality by concentrating support members and crossbeams in specific locations where compression stresses are most pronounced during frontal impacts. The K-shaped configuration places structural reinforcement locally at critical stress points rather than uniformly throughout the entire frame, achieving improved structural integrity while minimizing unnecessary weight addition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10988014B2Frame support assembly
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10988014B2 patent drawing
  • US10988014B2 patent drawing
  • US10988014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly includes a first frame rail and a second frame rail elongated along a longitudinal axis and spaced from each other along a lateral axis. The assembly includes a crossbeam extending along the lateral axis and fixed under the first frame rail and the second frame rail. The assembly includes a first support member extending transversely from the crossbeam to a first end fixed to the first frame rail. The assembly includes a second support member extending transversely from the crossbeam to a second end fixed to the second frame rail.