Key-to-Physical Table Segmentation for KV Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The management and optimization of key-to-physical (K2P) tables in key value (KV) data storage devices are non-optimized, leading to inefficiencies in storage and retrieval processes, particularly due to the large size of K2P tables that exceed the capacity of random access memory (RAM).

Innovation Solution

Segmenting the K2P table into multiple segments based on caching priorities, relocating entries accordingly, and applying uniform management operations such as prefetching to each segment to enhance storage and retrieval efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the K2P table is stored in RAM, then access speed is improved, but the device complexity and memory requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess speedVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The K2P table is divided into multiple segments based on caching priorities (hot, warm, cold data). Each segment can be managed independently, allowing frequent accesses to hot data while reducing the overall memory footprint required in RAM. This segmentation enables selective caching of only the most frequently accessed portions of the table.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different segments of the K2P table are assigned different caching priorities and storage locations. Hot data segments are kept in RAM for fast access, while cold data segments are stored in slower memory or on-disk. This local quality differentiation optimizes the trade-off between access speed and memory requirements by applying appropriate storage strategies to different parts of the table.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the entire K2P table is managed uniformly, then management simplicity is maintained, but performance optimization is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The K2P table is segmented into multiple priority levels (hot, warm, cold) based on access patterns. This segmentation enables differentiated management strategies for each segment, such as aggressive caching for hot data and lazy loading for cold data, thereby achieving performance optimization without requiring entirely complex management mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as caching priority, segment size, and eviction policies based on observed access patterns. By adjusting these parameters, the system can adapt to different workloads and optimize performance without requiring fundamentally complex management logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If K2P table size is reduced to fit in RAM, then access speed improves, but the table may not accommodate all necessary entries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess speedVSAvoidtable capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The K2P table is segmented into multiple priority levels (hot, warm, cold) based on access patterns. This segmentation enables differentiated management strategies for each segment, such as aggressive caching for hot data and lazy loading for cold data, thereby achieving performance optimization without requiring entirely complex management logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different segments of the K2P table are assigned different caching priorities and storage locations. Hot data segments are kept in RAM for fast access, while cold data segments are stored in slower memory or on-disk. This local quality differentiation optimizes the trade-off between access speed and memory requirements by applying appropriate storage strategies to different parts of the table.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11966630B2Key-to-physical table optimization for key value data storage devices
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11966630B2 patent drawing
  • US11966630B2 patent drawing
  • US11966630B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A data storage device includes a memory device and a controller coupled to the memory device. The controller is configured to segment a key to physical (K2P) table into two or more segments, wherein each segment of the two or more segments corresponds to a caching priority of key value (KV) pair data, organize the K2P table by storing and relocating one or more K2P table entries into a respective segment of the two or more segments, wherein the storing and relocating comprises moving a K2P table entry based on the caching priority of the KV pair data into the respective segment having the caching priority, and utilize the K2P table to manage KV pair data stored in the memory device, wherein utilizing the K2P table comprises applying a same management operation, such as prefetching, to each K2P table entry of a same segment.