Kart Chassis X-Structure for Impact Resistance and Spin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Kart chassis structures face challenges in balancing resistance to shocks and flexibility, particularly in rental karts, where deformation is essential for continued operation without frequent part replacements, while maintaining the ability to spin and handle curves effectively.

Innovation Solution

A kart chassis design featuring a pair of parallel tubular rails connected by transverse elements, with a front X-shaped structure formed by U-shaped tubes and straight reinforcing tubes, along with damping elements and gussets to distribute mechanical forces and reduce rigidity, allowing for improved shock absorption and torsional recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the chassis is made more rigid to resist shocks, then the strength and impact resistance improve, but the ability to spin and handle curves deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidability to spin
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The chassis is divided into multiple tubular elements (longitudinal rails, transverse elements, X-shaped structure) that work together to distribute forces. This segmentation allows the chassis to resist impacts while maintaining flexibility for spinning through the coordinated deformation of individual tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chassis is designed to dynamically adapt its rigidity based on the type of load applied. During side impacts, the tubular structure provides rigid resistance, while during cornering, the same structure allows controlled deformation to enable the spin effect necessary for curve handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If protective devices are added to absorb shock energy, then driver safety improves, but the forces transmitted to the frame increase causing ruptures or plastic deformations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidframe integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Protective devices are positioned as intermediary elements between the impact source and the chassis frame. These devices absorb and dissipate shock energy before it reaches the frame, preventing excessive forces from causing ruptures or plastic deformations while maintaining driver safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If the chassis is reinforced locally to resist high forces, then the strength at critical points improves, but the overall rigidity increases and spin capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal reinforcementVSAvoidspin capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The chassis employs local quality by providing reinforcement only where needed through the strategic placement of the X-shaped tube structure at the front and damping elements at specific attachment points. This allows critical areas to resist high forces while other areas maintain flexibility for spinning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances resistance to side impacts, reduces stress on structural elements, and maintains the kart's ability to spin and handle curves by distributing mechanical forces and reducing rigidity, thereby improving overall performance and durability.

Implementation Method 1

an X-shape with flare which allows a better absorption of forces diagonally on the chassis. Thus, in the event of stress on the side parts of the kart (for example in the event of an impact), this new form of chassis makes it possible to reduce the mechanical stresses on the structural elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce distribution: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the kart requires that the deformation be reversible over the highest possible range. This condition is essential, in particular in rental, in order to allow the continuation of the exploitation and to avoid frequent and therefore expensive changes of parts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 3

the capacity of the karts to take curves strongly depends on the deformation of the chassis which, if it is adequate, makes it possible to lift or relieve the rear inner wheel and therefore to avoid understeer. The torsion phenomenon undergone by a go-kart chassis in a bend is called 'spin'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2986487B1Kart chassis with increased impact resistance and corresponding kart
Publication Date: 2016.12.21 SODIKART
  • EP2986487B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2986487B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2986487B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A kart includes a chassis having a pair of substantially parallel tubular rails extending longitudinally and connected to one another at each end by at least one transverse tubular element. The kart chassis includes, in the front portion thereof, at least two substantially flared-U-shaped tubes positioned facing one another and assembled in the middle portion such as to form an X-shaped structure between the tubular rails, and at least two substantially rectilinear tubes disposed on each side of the X-shaped structure and each having a first end solidly connected to one of the tubular rails and another end solidly connected to a central portion of the X-shaped structure.