Kernel Cryptographic Interface for Asynchronous Hardware Offload
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Software-based cryptographic mechanisms used in network communication can degrade application performance due to compute-intensive operations, particularly during SSL session establishment and bulk encryption/decryption, leading to slowed system throughput.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a cryptographic framework that allows kernel consumers to request cryptographic functions, with the framework determining whether requests are synchronous or asynchronous and selecting between software and hardware providers to perform these functions, thereby offloading processing overhead from the system processor.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If software-based cryptographic mechanisms are used to ensure network security, then security is improved, but system throughput deteriorates due to compute-intensive operations
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts cryptographic operations from the main application processing flow and implements them as separate kernel-level cryptographic providers. This allows cryptographic functions to be performed in the kernel context rather than blocking application-level processing, thereby maintaining security while improving system throughput by preventing cryptographic operations from becoming bottlenecks in the application layer.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a kernel interface as an intermediary between applications and cryptographic providers. This intermediary layer manages cryptographic operations asynchronously, allowing applications to initiate cryptographic functions without blocking on their completion. The kernel interface coordinates between multiple cryptographic providers and applications, enabling security operations to proceed without degrading overall system performance.
2Reliability
If cryptographic operations are performed synchronously in the kernel consumer context, then security is maintained, but processing time increases and system performance degrades
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements asynchronous cryptographic operations where the kernel interface prepares and queues cryptographic requests in advance without immediately executing them. Cryptographic providers process these queued requests independently, allowing the application to continue processing other tasks while cryptographic operations complete in the background. This preliminary queuing mechanism eliminates blocking delays while maintaining security requirements.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces dynamic scheduling of cryptographic operations through the kernel interface, which can adjust the timing and execution context of cryptographic functions based on system conditions. Instead of rigid synchronous execution, the system dynamically manages cryptographic task scheduling, allowing flexible optimization of processing time while ensuring security operations are completed when needed.
3Adaptability or versatility
If multiple cryptographic providers are supported to enhance security capabilities, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a universal kernel interface that can work with multiple different cryptographic providers through a standardized abstraction layer. This single interface handles various cryptographic algorithms and providers uniformly, allowing the system to support diverse cryptographic functions without requiring separate interface implementations for each provider. The multi-functional design reduces overall complexity by consolidating interface management in one place.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the cryptographic system into distinct modular components: the kernel interface, cryptographic providers, and application consumers. Each component has a specific responsibility and can be independently developed, tested, and maintained. This segmentation allows multiple cryptographic providers to be added without increasing the complexity of the core interface, as each provider is an independent module that interfaces through the standardized kernel interface.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for performing a cryptographic function including calling into an encryption framework to perform the cryptographic function, wherein calling into the encryption framework comprises sending a request to perform the cryptographic function from a kernel consumer, and processing the request and returning the result to the kernel consumer, wherein processing the request comprises determining whether the request is synchronous or asynchronous, and determining which cryptographic provider to use to perform the cryptographic function.


