Kernel Density Maps for Tumor Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for diagnosing tumors, particularly prostate carcinoma, face challenges in accurately assessing the risk due to a large overlapping area between patients with and without tumors, with current solutions failing to adequately define the risk using multiple tumor markers and indicator substances, and relying heavily on complex computational methods that are data-dependent.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using tumor-specific and non-tumor-specific indicator substances, plotting their measured values in scatterplots, and applying the kernel-density method to create density maps that correspond to a positive prognostic value for tumor risk, utilizing tumor markers like PSA and other indicators such as age, to provide a clear risk assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple tumor markers and indicator substances are analyzed using prior art methods, then diagnostic information is obtained, but the large overlapping area between patients with and without tumors prevents accurate risk assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the diagnostic approach by changing from discrete threshold-based parameters to continuous probability density parameters. Instead of using fixed cut-off values for tumor markers, the invention employs kernel density estimation to calculate continuous probability densities, allowing for more nuanced risk assessment in the overlapping region between malignant and benign cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a new dimension to the diagnostic space by introducing probability density values as a third dimension beyond the traditional tumor marker measurements. This transforms 2D scatterplots of marker values into 3D density maps, enabling differentiation of risk levels within the overlapping area through vertical probability density representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If complex computational methods such as neural networks are used, then sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic results are improved, but the methods become too dependent on individual data and less generally applicable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic sensitivity and specificityVSAvoidgeneral applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces probability density functions as an intermediary layer between raw tumor marker data and diagnostic conclusions. This intermediary approach uses statistical theory (kernel density estimation) that is universally applicable across different datasets, rather than training complex neural networks on specific individual data, thereby maintaining both high diagnostic precision and broad general applicability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes from using complex black-box computational models to using interpretable statistical parameters (probability densities) that can be calculated universally. This parameter transformation maintains diagnostic accuracy while improving adaptability across different clinical scenarios and datasets through mathematically rigorous but universally applicable statistical methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional cut-off value methods are used for diagnostic decisions, then the process is simple, but the large overlapping area between tumor and non-tumor groups leads to inadequate risk definition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic process simplicityVSAvoidrisk information completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent preserves the simplicity of traditional methods by maintaining the familiar workflow structure, but adds a new dimension of probability density information. Clinicians still follow a simple process of measuring markers and comparing to references, but now enriched with continuous probability density values that provide complete risk information without complicating the operational workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces probability density calculations as an intermediary step that automatically processes the overlap region information. This intermediary computational layer handles the complex information processing, allowing clinicians to maintain simple decision-making processes while the system recovers and utilizes the risk information that would otherwise be lost in the overlapping area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8892363B2Method of using density maps based on marker values for the diagnosis of patients with diseases, and in particular tumors
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC
  • US8892363B2 patent drawing
  • US8892363B2 patent drawing
  • US8892363B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of using density maps based on marker values, and in particular tumor markers and other indicator substances/values for the diagnosis of patients with diseases, in particular tumorous diseases, and especially prostate carcinoma.