Kernel Monitor Debugging Restricted Container System Calls

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Debugging applications running in restricted containers is challenging due to nebulous error codes when system calls or capabilities are restricted, making it difficult to identify the root cause of failures, especially when applications are not designed with security in mind and lack human-readable executable code.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that include a kernel monitor and container manager to detect system calls, perform capability checks, and provide debug information associating system calls with their corresponding capabilities, offering clear error messages and allowing users to understand application behavior without source code access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If applications are run in restricted containers for security isolation, then security is improved, but debugging capability deteriorates due to nebulous error codes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddebugging capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (debugging tool/monitor) that sits between the restricted container and the developer. This intermediary intercepts system calls, translates nebulous error codes into meaningful debug information, and presents actionable insights to developers without compromising the security restrictions of the container environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring system call outcomes within the container and providing real-time debug information to developers. When a system call fails due to capability restrictions, the feedback loop translates the generic error into specific, actionable debug information that helps developers understand and resolve the issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If system calls are restricted in containers, then security is improved, but application functionality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidapplication functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic configuration of container capabilities, allowing system administrators to flexibly adjust which system calls are permitted or restricted based on specific application requirements. This dynamic approach maintains security by default while allowing functional adaptability when needed, resolving the contradiction between security restrictions and application versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If developers lack access to source code in containers, then security is improved, but troubleshooting capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtroubleshooting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The debugging tool acts as an intermediary that provides troubleshooting capabilities without requiring source code access. It monitors system calls, translates errors into meaningful information, and presents debug data to developers, enabling effective troubleshooting while maintaining the security boundary that prevents source code exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical approach of source code inspection with an automated monitoring and translation system. Instead of manually examining source code to diagnose issues, the system automatically captures system call data, translates it into meaningful debug information, and presents it to developers, substituting manual analysis with an automated intermediary system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9804952B1Application debugging in a restricted container environment
Publication Date: 2017.10.31 RED HAT INC
  • US9804952B1 patent drawing
  • US9804952B1 patent drawing
  • US9804952B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method of debugging an application running in a container includes detecting, by a kernel, a system call from an application running in a container. The method also includes performing a capability check based on detection of the system call. The capability check provides a set of capabilities used by the system call. The method further includes associating the system call with the set of capabilities and providing debug information based on the application run in the container. The debug information includes the association between the system call and the set of capabilities.