Automated Key Lifecycle Management in Distributed Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing cryptographic keys in a distributed environment is complex, especially with manual key rotation and network outages, which can lead to unauthorized access and cryptographic attacks.

Innovation Solution

A system that automates key lifecycle management by pre-assigning expiration times and predefined lifecycle phases, including creation, caching, distribution, producing, consuming, renewal, and expiration, ensuring secure key rotation and availability even during network outages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual key rotation is used in a distributed environment, then key security is improved, but system complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic key rotation where the key management system autonomously generates, distributes, and rotates cryptographic keys without manual intervention. The system self-manages the entire key lifecycle including creation, distribution to nodes, rotation scheduling, and expiration handling, eliminating the need for manual key adjustment while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-generates and pre-distributes cryptographic keys to nodes before they are needed. Keys are created in advance with predetermined expiration times and are automatically rotated before their validity period ends, ensuring continuous security without manual intervention during critical moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If frequent key rotation is implemented, then cryptographic attack resistance is improved, but network dependency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecryptographic attack resistanceVSAvoidnetwork outage impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system stores multiple valid cryptographic keys at each node in advance, creating a buffer that allows operation during network outages. When the network is unavailable, nodes can continue using previously distributed keys without interruption, and the system automatically switches to backup keys when needed, cushioning against the harmful effects of network failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

Keys are pre-distributed to nodes before network outages can occur. The system anticipates potential network failures by ensuring nodes have valid keys cached locally, allowing continuous operation during network partitions without requiring real-time network connectivity for key access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If manual key management is used, then key control is simplified, but time consumption for key rotation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey control simplicityVSAvoidkey rotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The key management system operates autonomously, automatically generating, distributing, and rotating keys without human intervention. The system monitors key expiration times, schedules rotations, and manages distribution to nodes automatically, eliminating the time-consuming manual processes while maintaining simple operational control through centralized automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs key generation and distribution in advance according to predetermined schedules. Keys are rotated before their expiration to prevent service interruptions, and the entire process is automated to eliminate manual time consumption while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If keys are distributed to multiple nodes, then system availability is improved, but key distribution complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem availabilityVSAvoidkey distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides cryptographic keys into segments or distributes different keys to different nodes based on their specific functions and requirements. Each node receives only the keys it needs, reducing the overall distribution complexity while maintaining system-wide availability. The key management system tracks and manages these distributed keys autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized key management system automatically handles the complexity of distributing keys to multiple nodes. It autonomously determines which nodes need which keys, distributes them appropriately, and manages rotations across the distributed system without requiring manual coordination, thus maintaining simple operation despite the distributed nature of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8724815B1Key management in a distributed system
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US8724815B1 patent drawing
  • US8724815B1 patent drawing
  • US8724815B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Secure information is managed for each host or machine in an electronic environment using cryptographic keys. In some embodiments, a globally distributed system manage and rotate keys across various nodes within the system based on a predetermined schedule of each key's lifecycle. The predetermined schedule decides when keys are created, distributed, and used with respect to each key's pre-assigned time (e.g., an expiration time, a creation time). The schedule of the key's lifecycle may be predetermined and adjusted based on various system requirements. The keys may be automatically rotated throughout the various nodes in the system in a way such that the keys are not unnecessarily exposed for too long but are accessible to the ciphertext producers and the ciphertext consumers when needed. Further, the keys are created and rotated in a way to ensure robustness of the system in the event of a global WAN outage or network partition.