Hierarchical Key-Value Store Architecture for Latency and Capacity Trade-offs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current key/value stores face challenges in simultaneously achieving high performance and large capacity due to the limitations of hardware and cost, with typical systems optimized for either performance or capacity but not both effectively.

Innovation Solution

A three-tiered key/value store architecture is implemented, utilizing Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) for high-performance key storage, Solid State Drive (SSD) for intermediate capacity and performance, and Hard Disk Drive (HDD) for large capacity, with hierarchical query processing that decouples key and value storage to optimize both performance and capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single storage device is used for both keys and values, then device complexity is reduced, but performance and capacity cannot be simultaneously optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidstorage architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the storage system into three separate tiers: a first storage device for keys, a second storage device for values, and a third storage device for metadata. This segmentation allows each storage device to be optimized for its specific function, enabling simultaneous improvement of performance and capacity without increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical query processing system with a query processing layer that acts as an intermediary between the storage devices and users. This intermediary manages the complexity of coordinating multiple storage devices, translating user queries into optimized access patterns across the three-tier storage architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If high-performance storage (DRAM) is used, then latency is reduced and throughput is increased, but capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess latencyVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the storage hierarchy by adding a third dimension of capacity through the second storage device (SSD/NVMe) and third storage device (HDD). This multi-dimensional storage architecture allows the system to achieve high speed for frequently accessed keys while providing extensive capacity through lower-cost storage media for values and metadata

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If large capacity storage (HDD) is used, then storage capacity is increased, but latency increases and throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidaccess latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing high-performance storage (first storage device) specifically for keys that require fast access, while using high-capacity storage (third storage device) for values that are accessed less frequently. This localized optimization ensures that critical operations maintain high speed while the system as a whole achieves large capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If keys and values are stored together, then storage management is simplified, but query processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage managementVSAvoidquery processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts keys from values and stores them in separate storage devices. This separation allows the query processing system to quickly locate keys in the first storage device without the overhead of searching through value data, significantly improving query processing efficiency while the hierarchical structure manages the complexity of separate storage locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8433695B2System architecture for integrated hierarchical query processing for key/value stores
Publication Date: 2013.04.30 FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8433695B2 patent drawing
  • US8433695B2 patent drawing
  • US8433695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A key/value store comprising a first tier storage device configured to store information about a plurality of keys for a plurality of values without the values, and a second tier storage device coupled to the first tier storage device and configured to store the values associated with the keys without the keys, wherein the first tier storage device has lower latency and higher throughput than the second tier storage device, and wherein the second tier storage device has higher capacity than the first tier storage device. Also disclosed is a method comprising receiving a key/value operation request at a first tier storage device, mapping a key in the key/value operation request to a locator stored in a second tier storage device if the key/value operation request is valid, and mapping the locator to a value in a third tier storage device if the key has a corresponding locator.