Keyboard Connection Portion Segmentation for Piano Tactile Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing keyboard devices fail to replicate the tactile feedback and rigidity of acoustic pianos effectively, particularly in the connection between keys and the frame, leading to inadequate flexibility and realism in key striking sensations.

Innovation Solution

The keyboard device incorporates a connection portion with a first region of lower rigidity extending in the key-longitude direction and two second regions with narrower widths, providing flexibility in the yawing direction and connected between the key and a frame, which enhances the tactile feedback by adjusting the width and rigidity of these regions to mimic the experience of striking an acoustic piano key.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the connection portion is made with high rigidity to support the key structure, then structural stability is improved, but tactile feedback realism deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidtactile feedback realism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The connection portion is divided into multiple regions with different rigidity characteristics. The first region has higher rigidity to maintain structural stability, while the second region has lower rigidity to provide realistic tactile feedback during key striking, allowing each part to fulfill its specific function optimally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The connection portion is segmented into distinct regions (first region and second region) with different width dimensions and rigidity properties, enabling the structure to simultaneously achieve both structural support and tactile realism through differentiated zone design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the connection portion width is increased to improve structural support, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but flexibility in yawing direction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidflexibility in yawing direction
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different width dimensions are applied to different regions of the connection portion. The first region has a greater width for enhanced load-bearing capacity, while the second region has a smaller width to maintain flexibility in the yawing direction, allowing each region to be optimized for its specific mechanical requirement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If the rigidity of the connection portion is increased to reduce key deformation, then structural integrity is improved, but tactile feedback realism deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidtactile feedback realism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connection portion incorporates regions with different rigidity characteristics - the first region provides structural integrity through higher rigidity, while the second region delivers tactile feedback realism through controlled lower rigidity, allowing the system to achieve both structural and sensory requirements simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10614781B2Keyboard device and electronic keyboard device
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 YAMAHA CORP
  • US10614781B2 patent drawing
  • US10614781B2 patent drawing
  • US10614781B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A keyboard device is provided. The keyboard device includes a key and a connection portion connected between the key and a frame. The connection portion possess a first region and second regions. The first region extends in a key-longitude direction and has a smaller width than the key in a scale direction. The second regions are arranged so as to be lined in front of and behind the first region in the key-longitude direction, have flexibility in a yawing direction, and have narrower widths than the first region in a scale direction.