Keyboard Flywheel One-Way Clutch for Noise and Keying Trade-off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing keyboard devices face a trade-off between improving the ease of continuous keying and controlling noise, as structures that inhibit key return to maintain engagement often generate noise, while those that allow key return to enhance ease of keying may compromise on noise control.

Innovation Solution

A keyboard device featuring a flywheel with an inner and outer wheel configured as a one-way clutch, where torque is transmitted during key pressing but not during key release, allowing for a balanced experience in ease of continuous keying and noise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If engagement between key and mass body is maintained to curb noise, then noise control is improved, but ease of continuous keying deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidease of continuous keying
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the engagement state between the key and mass body changeable. The engagement piece is configured to be engaged with the guide groove during key pressing to maintain connection and prevent noise, but can be separated during key release to allow quick return. This dynamic adjustment of engagement state resolves the contradiction between noise control and ease of continuous keying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If engagement between key and mass body is canceled to improve ease of continuous keying, then ease of continuous keying is improved, but noise is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of continuous keyingVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement mechanism dynamically adjusts its state based on operational phase. During key release, the engagement piece separates from the guide groove to eliminate inertial moment interference and enable quick key return. During subsequent key pressing, re-engagement occurs to prevent noise. This temporal separation of engagement states resolves the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If mass body is interlocked with key turning to apply key touching feeling, then key touching feeling is improved, but returning of key is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey touching feelingVSAvoidkey return time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the coupling state between key and mass body. During key pressing, the engagement piece is engaged with the guide groove to transmit force and provide key touching feeling through the mass body's inertial moment. During key release, the engagement is canceled to allow the key to return quickly without being dragged back by the mass body's inertia. This resolves the contradiction between providing tactile feedback and enabling quick return.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the operational cycle into distinct phases with different engagement states. The engagement piece and guide groove structure allows the system to switch between engaged state (during pressing) and separated state (during release). This segmentation of the operational process enables the system to optimize for different functions at different times, resolving the contradiction between key touching feeling and return speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient key pressing with reduced noise generation by ensuring the flywheel's inertial moment is utilized during key pressing and minimized during key release, enhancing both keying ease and noise management.

Implementation Method 1

a flywheel 1 turned by an actuator 3 of a key 9, and thus a key touching feeling is applied to the key 9... inhibition of returning of the key 9 due to the inertial moment of the flywheel 1 can be curbed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial moment: Moment of Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS11289060B2Keyboard device
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 ROLAND CORP
  • US11289060B2 patent drawing
  • US11289060B2 patent drawing
  • US11289060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A keyboard device is provided including a chassis; a mass body which is turnably installed in the chassis; and transmission means which transmits a driving force in response to key touching of a key to the mass body, wherein the mass body includes an inner wheel and an outer wheel installed on a radially outward side of the inner wheel and is configured to serve as a component for transmitting a torque in one-way direction between the inner wheel and the outer wheel. The transmission means is engaged with one of the inner wheel and the outer wheel of the mass body. The torque is transmitted between the inner wheel and the outer wheel of the mass body at a time of key touching. The torque is not transmitted between the inner wheel and the outer wheel of the mass body at a time of key release.