Keyfob Presence Verification for Relay Attack Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Passive keyless entry and start systems in vehicles are vulnerable to relay attacks, allowing unauthorized access and start of the vehicle by tricking the system into believing the keyfob is within proximity, despite it being elsewhere.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that includes sending a vehicle challenge signal to the keyfob, validating its presence within the vehicle, and providing a notification via a telematics unit if the keyfob is absent after the vehicle has started, using a vehicle transceiver and keyfob transceiver to ensure the keyfob's presence is verified within the passenger compartment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If passive keyless entry and start systems are implemented for automated entry and start, then ease of operation is improved, but vulnerability to relay attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated entry and startVSAvoidsecurity against relay attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs presence verification of the keyfob within the passenger compartment before allowing vehicle operation. This preliminary check ensures the keyfob is actually inside the vehicle rather than being relayed from a remote location, preventing relay attacks while maintaining automated entry and start functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors and verifies the keyfob's presence within the passenger compartment during vehicle operation. This feedback mechanism detects when the keyfob is absent (indicating a relay attack) and triggers appropriate security responses, thereby maintaining security while enabling automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If proximity-based automated start is enabled, then productivity is improved, but security risk increases due to relay attack vulnerability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle start automationVSAvoidrelay attack risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system verifies keyfob presence within the passenger compartment before enabling vehicle start. This preliminary verification ensures that the automated start function only activates when the keyfob is genuinely present inside the vehicle, eliminating relay attack vulnerability while preserving productivity benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous presence verification during vehicle operation. This feedback loop monitors whether the keyfob remains within the passenger compartment and can detect relay attacks in real-time, allowing the system to maintain automated start functionality while protecting against security risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the system accepts remote keyfob signals for vehicle operation, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of keyfob location deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote vehicle controlVSAvoidkeyfob proximity detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements location-specific verification by checking whether the keyfob is within the passenger compartment rather than merely within general proximity of the vehicle. This localized verification approach maintains ease of remote operation while improving measurement precision by confirming the keyfob's specific location inside the vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances security by preventing unauthorized vehicle operation and providing timely notifications to the user or authorities in case of theft or accidental keyfob left outside the vehicle, thereby reducing the risk of relay attacks.

Implementation Method 1

a vehicle transceiver (VT) carried by the vehicle and a portable keyfob... sending a vehicle challenge signal from the VT; receiving from the keyfob a valid first response to the vehicle challenge signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS8638202B2Keyfob proximity theft notification
Publication Date: 2014.01.28 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US8638202B2 patent drawing
  • US8638202B2 patent drawing
  • US8638202B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of providing a notification following a passive, keyless start of a vehicle when a keyfob for the vehicle is not within a passenger compartment of the vehicle. Where a motor is started using a passive keyless start (PKS) system having a keyfob transceiver within the keyfob and a vehicle transceiver (VT) within the vehicle, the absence of the keyfob may be determined by the failure to receive an accurate response signal from the keyfob transceiver following the transmission of a vehicle challenge signal from the vehicle transceiver. Upon this determination, a notification may be provided directly or indirectly to the vehicle user via a wireless carrier system.