Keyless Entry Signal Validation via Dynamic RF Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transportation systems lack secure and efficient methods for authenticating and authorizing vehicle operations, particularly in varying environmental security levels and proximity to other vehicles, which can lead to unauthorized access and safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A system that establishes a security level based on the vehicle's environment, determines the minimal radio frequency signal strength needed for communication, and performs commands only when this strength is achieved, using a combination of blockchain technology and radio frequency signaling to ensure secure and authorized interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If keyless entry systems allow remote commands to be performed on a transport, then ease of operation is improved, but security vulnerability increases due to unauthorized access risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekeyless entry operationVSAvoidsecurity against unauthorized access
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the RF signal strength parameter based on environmental security levels. When the transport is in a secure environment (e.g., private driveway), higher signal strengths are permitted enabling convenient remote operation. When in public or high-risk areas, the system reduces maximum permitted signal strength to prevent unauthorized remote commands, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The keyless entry system transitions from static authorization to dynamic authorization based on real-time environmental assessment. The processor continuously evaluates security levels and adjusts command execution permissions accordingly, allowing the system to adapt its security posture and operational constraints dynamically rather than using fixed rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the transport performs commands based on RF signals, then productivity is improved through automated operations, but security risk increases from potential unauthorized control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated vehicle operationsVSAvoidunauthorized access risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The processor acts as an intermediary between the RF signal receiver and command execution. It introduces a security evaluation layer that assesses environmental conditions and validates whether commanded operations should be permitted, preventing direct execution of potentially harmful commands while allowing legitimate automated operations to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary security assessments before executing commands by evaluating environmental security levels and determining maximum permitted RF signal strengths in advance. This preemptive validation prevents unauthorized commands from being executed while maintaining productivity for authorized operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If the system establishes security levels based on environment, then security is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental security assessmentVSAvoidsecurity processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transport system performs self-assessment of its environmental security level using its own sensors and processors without requiring external authentication servers or complex third-party verification systems. The processor evaluates signals from key fobs, analyzes RF signal strengths, and determines security levels autonomously, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the security and efficiency of vehicle operations by ensuring only authorized commands are executed, improving safety and reducing the risk of unauthorized access, while adapting to changing environmental security levels and proximity to other vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

determining a minimal radio frequency signal strength needed for a device to communicate with the transport

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency signaling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

determining a minimal radio frequency signal strength needed for a device to communicate with the transport

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal strength detection: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11663899B2Keyless entry message validation
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US11663899B2 patent drawing
  • US11663899B2 patent drawing
  • US11663899B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation includes one or more of establishing a security level based on an environment of a transport, determining a minimal radio frequency signal strength needed for a device to communicate with the transport based on the security level of the transport, and performing a command, by the transport, based on the communication when the minimal radio frequency signal strength is achieved.