Keystroke-Aided Word Recognition in Language Teaching Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computerized language teaching systems face challenges in environments where audible responses are not feasible, such as noise interference, and struggle to distinguish between mispronunciation and incorrect words, especially in multi-word responses.

Innovation Solution

A method where a student provides manual input, such as keystrokes corresponding to the first letter of each word, allowing silent practice and improving the computer's ability to recognize words and distinguish between correct and incorrect pronunciations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If audible responses are used in language teaching systems, then pronunciation quality can be tested, but the student cannot study in environments where audible responses are not possible or convenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepronunciation quality testingVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the response input into multiple modalities: manual input (keystrokes) and verbal response (audio). The manual input component allows students to study in any environment by entering keystrokes corresponding to words, while the verbal response component remains available for pronunciation testing when the environment permits. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by making the system adaptable to different environments while preserving pronunciation testing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If written responses are used instead of audible responses, then the student can study in any environment, but involvement with correct spelling interferes with the flow of response and pronunciation quality cannot be tested

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoidpronunciation quality testing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges manual input (keystrokes) and verbal response (audio) into a unified response mechanism. The student can provide keystrokes corresponding to words while simultaneously or subsequently providing verbal responses. This combination allows the system to capture both the lexical content (via keystrokes, enabling environmental adaptability) and the pronunciation quality (via audio, enabling pronunciation testing), thus resolving the contradiction between these two features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If the computer receives only verbal responses, then the system is simple to operate, but it has difficulty distinguishing between mispronunciation of correct words and utterance of incorrect words

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidword recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces manual input (keystrokes) as an intermediary element between the student and the computer's word recognition system. The keystrokes serve as a reference or expected word sequence that the computer can compare against the verbal response. This intermediary allows the system to maintain simple operation (the student just types what they would say) while dramatically improving word recognition accuracy by having a expected vs. actual comparison mechanism to distinguish mispronunciation from incorrect words.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If the computer receives multi-word verbal responses without additional input markers, then the system is simple, but it has difficulty distinguishing word boundaries and recognizing individual words

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput simplicityVSAvoidword boundary detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses preliminary action by having the student provide keystrokes corresponding to expected words before or during the verbal response. These preliminary keystrokes establish the expected word boundaries and sequence. When the computer receives the verbal multi-word response, it can compare the audio stream against the pre-established keystroke sequence to accurately identify word boundaries and recognize individual words, thus improving word boundary detection while maintaining input simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8002551B2Language skills teaching method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2011.08.23 ROSETTA STONE LTD
  • US8002551B2 patent drawing
  • US8002551B2 patent drawing
  • US8002551B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A student providing a multi-word response in a computerized language teaching system provides a manual input concurrently with each responsive word. For example, he might enter a keystroke correspondent to the first letter of each word. When using the teaching computer silently, a student will typically “speak” each word mentally as he enters a keystroke, so the limited experience is almost as effective as speaking out loud. When a student types one or more keystrokes concurrently with each word that he speaks, the computer will be able to detect when a student is responding with a correct word, but merely mispronouncing it. Also, since the computer will receive a keystroke as the student starts each new word, it is better able to distinguish the boundaries between words and recognize them more reliably.