Keyword Filtering System Using Multi-Metric Scoring
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current search engine technologies face challenges in efficiently filtering and prioritizing keywords based on multiple metrics, leading to difficulties in identifying relevant keywords for marketing strategies amidst vast amounts of data.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that involve determining multiple sets of numbers associated with keywords using various metrics, applying user-defined metric rules, and calculating combination scores to filter and prioritize keywords, allowing users to customize the filtering process based on importance weights.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If multiple metrics are used to evaluate keywords, then the accuracy of keyword selection is improved, but the complexity of the filtering process increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the keyword filtering process into distinct modules: a data collection module that gathers multiple metrics (search volume, competition level, conversion rate), a scoring module that calculates weighted scores for each keyword, and a filtering module that selects keywords based on predefined criteria. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific aspects of the complex evaluation independently, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies parameter changes by allowing dynamic adjustment of metric weights and filtering thresholds. Users can modify the importance weights assigned to different metrics (e.g., prioritizing conversion rate over search volume) and adjust minimum score thresholds based on campaign objectives. This flexibility enables the system to adapt to different marketing scenarios, maintaining high accuracy across diverse keyword selection requirements while simplifying the user interaction through intuitive parameter customization.
2Measurement precision
If multiple metrics are collected and processed, then the quality of keyword data is improved, but the processing time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing metric values for keywords in a database before the actual filtering process. Historical data on search volume, competition levels, and conversion rates are collected and stored in advance, allowing the system to retrieve ready-to-use data during keyword evaluation rather than performing complex calculations in real-time. This pre-processing approach significantly reduces processing time while maintaining high data quality through comprehensive metric collection.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces complex real-time mechanical processing with optimized data retrieval and pre-computed scoring mechanisms. Instead of performing exhaustive calculations for each keyword during the filtering process, the system uses pre-calculated scores and stored metric data that can be quickly retrieved and applied to current keyword evaluation. This substitution of real-time computation with pre-processed data significantly reduces processing time while preserving the quality of multi-metric analysis.
3Measurement precision
If keywords are filtered based on multiple criteria, then the relevance of selected keywords is improved, but the number of available keywords decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies dynamics by enabling flexible adjustment of filtering criteria and score thresholds based on campaign objectives and available resources. Users can dynamically modify the minimum score requirements, weightings of different metrics, and inclusion/exclusion rules to balance between keyword relevance and quantity. This dynamic configuration allows the same system to serve different marketing scenarios - from highly selective campaigns requiring top-tier keywords to broader campaigns needing larger keyword sets - thereby maintaining relevance while preserving adequate keyword volume.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements partial action by allowing users to apply filtering criteria selectively rather than uniformly across all keywords. The system can identify and apply stricter filtering to specific keyword categories or campaigns while maintaining more inclusive criteria for others. This partial application of filtering logic enables the system to deliver high-relevance keywords for critical campaigns while preserving broader keyword availability for less demanding campaigns, effectively balancing relevance and quantity through differentiated filtering strategies.
Data Source
AI summary
A system and method for filtering keywords. The method may include receiving a first set of keywords. The method may include determining a first set of numbers associated with a first metric relating to the first set of keywords and a second set of numbers associated with a second metric relating to the first set of keywords. The method may include receiving at least one metric rule relating to the first and the second metric. The method may include determining a respective combination number for each keyword in the first set of keywords based on the first set of numbers, the second set of numbers, and the metric rule. The method may include filtering the first set of keywords based on the respective combination numbers to produce a second set of keywords.


