Keyword Popularity Period Detection Using Cycle Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques fail to accurately identify the period of popularity for keywords that appear periodically, such as daily, weekly, or yearly, limiting the ability to forecast future popularity.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that determines a threshold value based on keyword usage in each unit period within a cycle, identifies candidate periods for popularity, excludes periods with unusual usage patterns, and determines the actual popularity period using dynamic programming and linear function calculations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a technique detects keyword popularity from a local viewpoint (change from one counting period to another), then it can determine when a keyword becomes popular, but it cannot identify the complete popularity period within a cycle from a broader viewpoint

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of popularity start timeVSAvoidviewpoint scope limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a local one-period comparison viewpoint to a global cycle-period viewpoint by analyzing keyword usage across multiple unit periods within a complete cycle. This dimensional shift enables identification of the entire popularity period rather than just detecting when popularity starts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides a cycle period into multiple unit periods and analyzes keyword usage in each segment. By segmenting the cycle period and comparing usage patterns across segments, the system can identify the complete popularity period within the cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If a threshold value is set to identify candidate popularity periods, then periods with high keyword usage can be detected, but periods with temporary or artificial usage increases cannot be distinguished from genuine popularity periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepopularity period identification efficiencyVSAvoidpopularity period identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback by comparing the situation in candidate popularity periods with the overall periodic popularity pattern of the keyword. This feedback mechanism allows the system to distinguish genuine popularity periods from those with temporary or artificial usage increases by checking consistency with the established periodic pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by excluding candidate periods that do not conform to the periodic popularity pattern before final determination. This pre-filtering prevents temporary or artificial usage spikes from being incorrectly identified as genuine popularity periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Measurement precision

If keyword usage data is analyzed for each unit period within a cycle, then the complete popularity period can be identified, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepopularity period identification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by first determining a threshold value based on historical keyword usage data before analyzing each unit period. This pre-established threshold simplifies the subsequent analysis by providing a clear criterion for identifying candidate popularity periods, reducing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by using the threshold value as a dynamic criterion that adapts to the specific keyword's usage patterns. This parameter-based approach allows efficient filtering of unit periods while maintaining high accuracy in identifying genuine popularity periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9208503B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, information processing program, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 RAKUTEN GROUP INC
  • US9208503B2 patent drawing
  • US9208503B2 patent drawing
  • US9208503B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus determines a threshold value of the number of times of use of a keyword on the basis of the number of times of use of the keyword in each unit period included in a cycle period. Next, the information processing apparatus identifies a period in which the numbers of times of use exceeds the threshold value in the cycle period as a candidate of a popularity period of the keyword. Next, the information processing apparatus excludes the identified period from the popularity period if a situation in which the numbers of times of use in the identified period exceed the threshold value is different from a situation based on a periodic popularity of the keyword. When the identified candidate period is not excluded from the popularity period, the information processing apparatus determines the identified period to be the popularity period.