Representative Keyword Selection for Contextual Ad Serving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engines face challenges in selecting contextually relevant advertisements for web pages, as they rely on manual keyword selection and lack efficient methods to determine the most representative keywords based on web page content.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for selecting representative keywords from an initial web page by analyzing the frequency of appearance and proper nouns, using these keywords to query a network, and ranking them for relevance, thereby selecting contextually relevant advertisements to serve alongside the web page.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual keyword selection is used for advertisement targeting, then advertisers can provide custom advertisements with associated keywords, but the system lacks efficient methods to determine the most representative keywords based on web page content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekeyword selection accuracyVSAvoidkeyword analysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the web page content analysis into multiple independent components: extracting candidate keywords from the web page, querying search engines for each candidate, analyzing query results, and ranking keywords based on multiple criteria. This segmentation allows each component to be processed independently and efficiently, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by first extracting candidate keywords from the web page before conducting search engine queries. It also pre-ranks keywords based on frequency and other criteria before final selection. This preliminary processing reduces the complexity of the main keyword selection task while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple keyword candidates are analyzed through search engine queries, then the most representative keywords can be identified, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekeyword representativenessVSAvoidkeyword selection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by analyzing only a selected number of top-ranked keyword candidates rather than all possible keywords. It performs search engine queries on a limited set of candidates that meet certain frequency and relevance thresholds, thereby reducing processing time while maintaining keyword representativeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by adjusting the number of query results analyzed, the frequency thresholds for candidate selection, and the ranking weights. These parameter adjustments allow the system to balance between processing time and keyword accuracy based on specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If keyword frequency and proper nouns are used as selection criteria, then contextually relevant advertisements can be selected, but the system requires multiple querying and analyzing operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertisement contextual relevanceVSAvoidad selection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple selection criteria (keyword frequency, proper noun detection, query result analysis) into a unified ranking system. By combining these different approaches into a single comprehensive evaluation framework, the system achieves high adaptability for contextual relevance while improving overall productivity through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal keyword selection system that can handle various types of web pages and advertisement types using the same core methodology. The multi-functional approach allows the system to adapt to different contexts while maintaining efficient processing through a standardized workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9292863B2Representative keyword selection
Publication Date: 2016.03.22 R2 SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US9292863B2 patent drawing
  • US9292863B2 patent drawing
  • US9292863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods in clued those for serving one or more advertisements contextually-relevant to an initial web page. Terms are selected from the initial web page that may be used as representative keywords to select advertisements that are contextually relevant to the initial web page. Keyword candidates are filtered via a series of operations that include: querying a network for web pages where the one or more keyword candidates are found, filtering the web pages based on time/date characteristics and a pre-defined number of web pages, analyzing the web pages using the one or more keyword candidates, and selecting certain keyword candidates to be representative keywords based on the analysis. The one or more representative keywords may be used to select one or more advertisements that may then be served with the initial web page.