Internal Dual Return Ducts for Lumber Kiln Air Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Direct fired lumber drying kilns face challenges in maintaining consistent air circulation and heat distribution during reverse fan cycles, leading to inefficiencies and non-uniform drying due to pressure imbalances and the need for costly, maintenance-intensive external return ducts.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an internal dual return duct system that draws return air from the low-pressure side of the fan wall, eliminating the need for modulating dampers and reducing pressure differences between forward and reverse fan cycles, while keeping the return air within the kiln to minimize heat loss and corrosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If external return ducts are used to draw return air during reverse fan cycles, then air circulation is maintained, but heat loss and corrosion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat lossVSAvoidair circulation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The return air duct system is segmented into multiple ducts positioned at different locations within the kiln. During reverse fan cycles, return air is drawn through these internal ducts from the low-pressure side, keeping the air path within the kiln boundaries and preventing heat loss to the external environment while maintaining reliable air circulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The return air ducts are nested within the kiln structure itself, rather than being external. This nesting allows the return air path to be contained within the heated volume of the kiln, minimizing heat loss while ensuring consistent air circulation during reverse fan operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If modulating dampers are used to balance pressure differences, then air flow is controlled, but device complexity and maintenance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure balance controlVSAvoiddamper system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The modulating damper component is extracted and eliminated from the system. Instead of using dampers to balance pressure differences, the design relies on the natural pressure differentials created by fan rotation and the strategic placement of multiple return air ducts, simplifying the system while maintaining ease of pressure balance control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the inherent pressure differentials generated during fan rotation to automatically balance air flow. The return air ducts are positioned to draw air from the low-pressure side during reverse cycles, eliminating the need for active dampers and allowing the system to self-regulate pressure balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If return air is drawn from high-pressure side during reverse cycles, then air circulation is maintained, but heat distribution uniformity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrying uniformityVSAvoidair circulation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The return air duct system is designed to dynamically adapt to fan rotation direction. During reverse fan cycles, the system draws return air from the low-pressure side through internally positioned ducts, ensuring that air circulation efficiency is maintained while promoting uniform heat distribution and drying across the lumber load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures consistent air circulation and heat distribution, reducing fuel consumption, improving drying uniformity, and simplifying burner control, while being cost-effective and requiring less maintenance compared to external duct systems.

Implementation Method 1

draws return air from the low-pressure side of the fan wall, eliminating the need for modulating dampers and reducing pressure differences between forward and reverse fan cycles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

keeping the return air within the kiln to minimize heat loss and corrosion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat loss: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 3

the heated lumber 136 passes heat to the green lumber 140 to partially heat and dry the green lumber 140

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Convection

Implementation Method 4

the heated lumber 136 passes heat to the green lumber 140

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 5

the green lumber 140 cools the heated lumber 136 by absorbing heat and by evaporating the moisture content of the green lumber 140

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS9423176B1System for balancing lumber kiln return air
Publication Date: 2016.08.23 KILN DRYING SYST & COMPONENTS LLC
  • US9423176B1 patent drawing
  • US9423176B1 patent drawing
  • US9423176B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus that employs dual air ducts is described for balancing the return air flow between forward and reverse fan directions in a direct-fired lumber kiln. As freshly heated air enters the kiln, this system forces the air to pass through the stacks of lumber at least once before returning to be reheated. The disclosed apparatus and methods enable more efficient use of energy, reduce drying time and improve the uniformity and precision of the lumber drying process.