Kinematic Chain Configuration for Faster Mechanical System Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanism design in mechanical engineering faces challenges in selecting effective configurations for mechanical systems due to conflicting design goals and the complexity of combining mechanical devices, leading to time-consuming trial-and-error approaches that may overlook more efficient solutions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method generates a set of candidate mechanical systems using kinematic building blocks, applying dynamic equations to optimize configurations based on mechanical inputs and outputs, enabling automated selection and design of mechanical assemblies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If trial-and-error approach is used to select mechanical system configurations, then designers can eventually find a working solution, but the design process becomes time-consuming and may overlook more effective configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of mechanical system configurationVSAvoiddesign process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining a comprehensive library of kinematic building blocks with their motion characteristics and connection rules before the actual design process. This allows the automated system to efficiently evaluate multiple configurations without trial-and-error, as the foundational elements and their properties are already established and ready for systematic combination and optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual trial-and-error mechanical design process with an automated computer-implemented system. The automated system uses algorithms to generate, evaluate, and optimize mechanical configurations based on predefined criteria, substituting human iterative testing with computational analysis that can simultaneously assess multiple configurations and identify optimal solutions more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple mechanical devices are combined to achieve complex functionality, then the system can meet diverse design goals, but the device complexity increases making selection and optimization difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capability of mechanical systemVSAvoidcomplexity of mechanical system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by breaking down complex mechanical systems into standardized kinematic building blocks (such as gears, linkages, and other motion-transforming elements). Each building block has defined motion characteristics and connection interfaces, allowing complex functionalities to be achieved through systematic combination of simpler, well-understood components. This segmentation makes the design and optimization process more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal library of kinematic building blocks that can be applied across multiple design scenarios. These standardized components serve multiple functions and can be combined in various configurations to achieve different mechanical outcomes, reducing the need for custom-designed elements and simplifying the selection process for complex systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If physical attributes of mechanical devices are varied through continuous values to optimize performance, then the system can achieve precise functionality, but the number of possible configurations becomes nearly infinite making selection problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of mechanical outputVSAvoidnumber of possible configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies parameters of kinematic building blocks (such as gear ratios, link lengths, and transmission ratios) within defined ranges to optimize mechanical system performance. The automated evaluation system assesses how changes in these parameters affect the overall system output, allowing precise functionality to be achieved through controlled parameter adjustment rather than exploring all possible continuous configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through an automated evaluation system that assesses each generated mechanical configuration against predefined performance criteria. The system provides feedback on how well each configuration meets the design goals, allowing the optimization process to iteratively refine parameter selections and identify the most effective configurations without manually evaluating all possibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250371212A1Techniques for generating optimized mechanical systems
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 AUTODESK INC
  • US20250371212A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371212A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371212A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for generating a mechanical system, the method comprising: based on a mechanical input to the mechanical system and a target mechanical output of the mechanical system, generating a set of multiple candidate mechanical systems for generating the target mechanical output in response to receiving the mechanical input, wherein each candidate mechanical system includes multiple mechanical building blocks that form a kinematic chain; selecting a candidate mechanical system included in the set of multiple candidate mechanical systems; and generating an optimized configuration of the selected candidate mechanical system based on a set of dynamic equations for the mechanical system, wherein each dynamic equation included in the set of dynamic equations corresponds to one mechanical building block of the selected candidate mechanical system.