Kinetic Shape Equations for Ground Reaction Force Redirection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies lack the ability to determine the optimal kinetic shape for applications that require a specific reactive force response to an applied force, particularly in devices like shoes and prosthetics, where the force redirection and rolling dynamics are not adequately addressed.

Innovation Solution

Derivation of two- and three-dimensional kinetic shape equations that allow for the design of shapes producing desired ground reaction forces by solving for applied and reactive forces, using equations such as Equations (11) and (32) to create objects with specific force profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional shapes are used in devices like shoes and prosthetics, then the device structure is simple, but the ability to generate desired reactive forces is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactive forceVSAvoidshape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the geometric parameters of the shape (radius, curvature, orientation) to control the ground reaction force characteristics. The kinetic shape equations allow systematic variation of shape parameters to achieve desired force profiles while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by designing shapes that generate different reactive forces during rolling motion compared to static conditions. The kinetic shape equations account for motion-induced force variations, enabling the shape to adapt its force output based on rolling velocity and orientation changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If kinetic shapes are designed to produce specific ground reaction forces, then the force control precision is improved, but the difficulty of determining optimal shape increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce control precisionVSAvoidshape optimization difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex iterative mechanical design processes with analytical kinetic shape equations. These equations directly compute the optimal shape geometry from desired force specifications, eliminating the need for trial-and-error prototyping and complex simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The kinetic shape equations serve multiple functions: they predict ground reaction forces, optimize shape geometry, and guide manufacturing. This universal mathematical framework handles various force control requirements (direction, magnitude, timing) through a single systematic approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If rolling dynamics are incorporated into shape design, then the reactive force generation capability is improved, but the complexity of force redirection control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactive force generationVSAvoidforce redirection control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetry by designing kinetic shapes with non-uniform curvature distributions that naturally redirect forces during rolling. The asymmetric geometry causes the contact point to shift in controlled ways, generating directional reactive forces without complex active control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses force redirection by incorporating three-dimensional shape features that exploit the vertical dimension during rolling. The kinetic shape equations account for forces in multiple directions (horizontal, vertical, lateral) simultaneously, enabling comprehensive force control through geometric design rather than separate control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the construction of devices like GEMS, prosthetic shoe soles, and crutches with optimized kinetic shapes that enhance gait rehabilitation and efficiency by accurately predicting and redirecting ground reaction forces.

Implementation Method 1

Kinetic shapes are shapes that can be used to provide a desired reactive force in response to an applied force. If a kinetic shape is incorporated into a shoe, for example, as the outer edges of the wheels mounted to the shoe, the force of the wearer's weight applied during a step can generate a reactive force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling: Wheel

Data Source

PatentUS20260087185A1Systems and methods for designing kinetic shapes
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US20260087185A1 patent drawing
  • US20260087185A1 patent drawing
  • US20260087185A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a kinetic shape is designed by determining an applied force to be applied to an object that is to incorporate the kinetic shape, determining a reactive force that is desired to be produced in response to the applied force, inputting the applied force and the reactive force into a kinetic shape equation, and solving the equation to obtain the kinetic shape.