Kirigami-Inspired Adhesive Structures for Reversible Adhesion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adhesive technologies face challenges in achieving high adhesive strength with reversible adhesion, while minimizing residue and susceptibility to degradation, often requiring complex fabrication and specialized equipment.

Innovation Solution

Kirigami-inspired structures with spatially varying stiff and compliant regions, interconnected by cuts, enhance adhesion force by a factor of ~100 and provide anisotropic properties through controlled bending rigidity and contact width, using laser machining on continuous adhesive films.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional pressure-sensitive adhesives are used to achieve high adhesive strength, then adhesive strength is improved, but reversibility deteriorates and residue is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive strengthVSAvoidreversibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive interface is segmented into multiple discrete pillars arranged in arrays, replacing conventional continuous pressure-sensitive adhesive layers. This segmentation enables controlled adhesion through hierarchical structures (micro-pillars with nanoscale features) that can be detached individually, providing reversible adhesion without residue while maintaining high adhesive strength through cumulative contact area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive structures exhibit local quality variations through different pillar geometries, materials, and surface treatments at specific locations. This allows optimization of adhesion properties in different regions of the adhesive interface, enabling high adhesive strength where needed while maintaining reversibility through localized design features such as tapered pillars or specific material compositions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If microstructured surfaces are used to control adhesion, then adhesive strength is improved, but device complexity increases due to specialized equipment and complex procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive strengthVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive structures serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide adhesive bonding, enable reversible detachment, control anisotropic adhesion ratios, and facilitate easy release. This multi-functionality is achieved through geometric design of pillar arrays rather than requiring separate systems, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining high adhesive performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Adhesive properties are controlled by changing geometric parameters (pillar height, diameter, spacing, arrangement) and material properties rather than requiring complex fabrication equipment. This allows tuning of adhesive strength and reversibility through parameter optimization using standard manufacturing techniques, reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If adhesive strength is increased through conventional methods, then adhesive capacity is improved, but ease of release deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive capacityVSAvoidease of release
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive structures exhibit dynamic behavior where the same pillar array provides high adhesive capacity during attachment but enables easy release through controlled detachment mechanisms. The dynamic response includes anisotropic adhesion ratios that allow strong bonding in one direction while facilitating release in another direction, achieving both high adhesive capacity and ease of release

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If homogeneous adhesive systems are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but adhesive enhancement is limited compared to spatially controlled layouts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadhesive enhancement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive interface is segmented into multiple discrete pillars arranged in arrays, replacing conventional continuous pressure-sensitive adhesive layers. This segmentation enables controlled adhesion through hierarchical structures (micro-pillars with nanoscale features) that can be detached individually, providing reversible adhesion without residue while maintaining high adhesive strength through cumulative contact area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive structures exhibit local quality variations through different pillar geometries, materials, and surface treatments at specific locations. This allows optimization of adhesion properties in different regions of the adhesive interface, enabling high adhesive strength where needed while maintaining reversibility through localized design features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The kirigami-inspired adhesives offer high adhesive capacity with easy release, demonstrating anisotropic adhesive ratios of ~10 and efficient energy use during separation, suitable for applications like climbing robots and wearable electronics.

Implementation Method 1

Spatially controlled layouts of elasticity can provide enhanced adhesion over homogeneous systems. Emerging techniques in kirigami, where designed cuts in materials impart highly tunable stiffness and geometry, offer an intriguing approach to create well-defined layouts of prescribed elastic regions.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

Here, we show that kirigami-inspired structures at interfaces provide a new mechanism to spatially control and enhance adhesion strength while providing directional characteristics for smart interfaces.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20250277139A1Kirigami-inspired structures for smart adhesion
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 IOWA STATE UNIV RES FOUND INC
  • US20250277139A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277139A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277139A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Spatially controlled layouts of elasticity can provide enhanced adhesion over homogeneous systems. Here, kirigami-inspired structures at interfaces provide a new mechanism to spatially control and enhance adhesion strength while providing directional characteristics for smart interfaces. We use kirigami-inspired cuts to define stiff and compliant regions, where above a critical, material-defined length scale, bending rigidity and contact width can be tuned to enhance adhesive force capacity by a factor of ˜100 across a spatially patterned adhesive sheet. The directional nature of these designs also imparts anisotropic responses, where peeling in different directions results in anisotropic adhesion ratios of ˜10. The bending rigidity and contact width of kirigami-inspired structures and interconnects control the adhesive capacity. These new interfacial structures and design criteria provide diverse routes for advanced adhesive functionality, including spatially controlled systems, wearable kirigami-inspired electronics, and anisotropic kirigami-inspired bandages that enable strong adhesive capacity while maintaining easy release.