Kitchen appliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current kitchen appliance attachment recognition systems are either overly complex and expensive, or they compromise water-tightness and flexibility, making it difficult to extend the number of attachments without mechanical modifications, and pose safety risks due to user errors from incorrect settings.

Innovation Solution

A kitchen appliance with a sensor system that distinguishes between three conditions related to a detectable magnetic element, allowing for the identification of multiple attachment parameters, including orientation and working parameters, using omnipolar hall sensors to transmit ternary codes for improved attachment recognition and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a mechanical switch system with multiple switches is used to detect multiple attachments, then the number of detectable attachments increases, but the device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of detectable attachmentsVSAvoidnumber of switches
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical switch system with an optical sensor system. Instead of using multiple mechanical switches that require physical contact and complex wiring, the invention uses optical sensors (such as LED sensors) that detect the presence and orientation of attachments through optical signals. This substitution dramatically reduces mechanical complexity while maintaining or enhancing the number of detectable attachment configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The optical sensor system serves multiple functions: it detects the presence of attachments, determines their orientation (e.g., left-handed or right-handed configurations), and identifies different attachment types all through a single sensor mechanism. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate switches for each detection purpose, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple openings are provided in the motor unit housing for mechanical actuators, then multiple attachments can be detected, but the water-tightness of the housing is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of attachment detection capabilitiesVSAvoidwater-tightness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical actuator openings with an optical detection system that can function through existing housing structures. The optical sensors can detect attachments through the housing material itself or through minimal openings, eliminating the need for large mechanical access points that compromise water-tightness. This maintains the reliability and sealing integrity of the motor unit housing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system is designed to accommodate future attachment extensions, then the adaptability increases, but the initial device complexity and number of required switches increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuture extension capabilityVSAvoidinitial switch configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical sensor system is inherently dynamic and flexible in its detection capabilities. Unlike fixed mechanical switch configurations, the optical system can be programmed to recognize new attachment patterns and orientations without requiring physical modifications to the sensor array or housing. This dynamic adaptability allows for future attachment extensions while maintaining simple initial device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If user selection of programs is required for each attachment, then the ease of operation decreases due to potential user errors, but the device complexity remains low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk of user errorsVSAvoidattachment recognition system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical sensor system enables the appliance to automatically identify the attached attachment type and orientation, and self-select the appropriate operating program without user intervention. The system serves itself by detecting the attachment configuration and autonomously configuring optimal operating parameters, thereby eliminating user errors while the complexity is managed through automated control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the safety and performance of kitchen appliances by automatically selecting optimal settings for different attachments, reducing user errors, and allowing for future extension of attachments without mechanical changes, while maintaining water-tightness and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

using omnipolar hall sensors to transmit ternary codes for improved attachment recognition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240148189A1Kitchen appliance
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 DE LONGHI BRAUN HOUSEHOLD GMBH
  • US20240148189A1 patent drawing
  • US20240148189A1 patent drawing
  • US20240148189A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A kitchen appliance is disclosed comprising a body to which one or more attachments may be fitted, the body comprising at least one sensor configured to distinguish between at least three conditions relating to a detectable element associated with an attachment, and a controller configured to identify a parameter relating to the attachment in dependence upon the sensed condition. Other embodiments are also disclosed.