A kitchen device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing kitchen devices are inefficient in pulverizing or blending a broad range of food products due to a universal inner surface at the bottom of the container, which does not optimize processing for different types of food.

Innovation Solution

A kitchen device with a jug that features interchangeable insert units placed on the inner surface of the bottom area, allowing the shape of the processing surface to be adapted for specific food types, enhancing the efficiency of food processing and quality of the final product.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a universal inner surface is used at the bottom of the container, then the device can process broad scope of foods, but the efficiency of pulverizing or blending certain products is unsatisfactory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescope of foodsVSAvoidefficiency of pulverizing or blending
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom inner surface is segmented into a universal base surface and interchangeable insert units. Each insert unit can be detached and replaced with another, allowing the processing surface geometry to be changed according to the specific food type, thus resolving the contradiction between universal applicability and specialized processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing surface is made dynamic through the interchangeable insert units that can be changed during operation. This allows the system to adapt its geometry to match the specific requirements of different food products, maintaining high processing efficiency across diverse food types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the processing surface is optimized for specific food types, then the efficiency of pulverizing or blending is improved, but the device complexity increases due to multiple insert units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of pulverizing or blendingVSAvoidstructure of jug
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple insert units are designed with a universal outer geometry that fits the same mounting interface on the jug. This universal interface design allows different processing surface geometries to be used with the same base structure, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining specialized processing capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Only the local processing surface geometry varies through interchangeable inserts, while the rest of the jug structure remains universal and unchanged. This localized differentiation minimizes the increase in overall device complexity while achieving optimized processing for specific food types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3335603B1A kitchen device
Publication Date: 2021.12.01 BSH HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP3335603B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3335603B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3335603B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Kitchen device (1) for processing food stuff, comprising a driving means suitable for driving a processing arrangement (10) provided with a processing tool (15) and disposed in a bottom area (11) of a jug (2), has at least one interchangeable insert unit (20) to be placed on the inner surface (12) of the bottom area (11) of the jug (2), said insert unit (20) being adapted to change the shape of the inner surface (12) in order to process different kinds of food stuff. Thus, the kitchen device can process efficiently various kind of food by placing the insert units provided with the processing surface, adapted to a particular kind of food.